2012
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entecavir Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis D

Abstract: One year of entecavir treatment is ineffective in CHD. Any generalized beneficial effect of nucleoside/nucleotide analog treatment may necessitate prolonged treatment. Patients with CHD with HBV dominance, which is likely to occur in the later phases of CHD, may be a reasonable patient cohort in which to target nucleoside/nucleotide analog therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Four-week administration of ETV strongly reduced HBV viremia and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels, but had no impact on circulating HBsAg, HDV viremia and intrahepatic HDV loads. These results are in line with data from clinical trials showing that 1-year treatment with peg-IFN-α 4 but not with nucleoside analogs, like ETV 20 , reduced HDV viremia in infected patients 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Four-week administration of ETV strongly reduced HBV viremia and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels, but had no impact on circulating HBsAg, HDV viremia and intrahepatic HDV loads. These results are in line with data from clinical trials showing that 1-year treatment with peg-IFN-α 4 but not with nucleoside analogs, like ETV 20 , reduced HDV viremia in infected patients 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Translation of bench side work to clinical practice has not occurred in CDH, and several attempts to benefit from the progress in CHC or CHB treatment have proved disappointing. In this context, famciclovir, lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir were without effect in CDH (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) or provided no additional benefit when combined with IFNα over IFN monotherapy in the case of ribavirin and lamivudine (6,10,13,14). Peg-IFNα-adefovir combination also had no additional effect over peg-IFNα monotherapy in terms of virologic, biochemical and histologic responses, but appeared to be better compared to monotherapy in decreasing quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, increasing studies reveal an ineffectiveness of these nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and the poor response rate to interferons [24,25]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%