1987
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1987.04460040097025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteral Feeding in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has also been studied in premature and very low birth weight infants in neonatal intensive care. Most of the studies found no difference in GRVs between the two groups (Kocan and Hickisch 1986; Toce et al 1987; Silvestre et al 1996) (but there were different GRVs used), with one study finding a higher GRV in the continuously fed group (Schanler et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has also been studied in premature and very low birth weight infants in neonatal intensive care. Most of the studies found no difference in GRVs between the two groups (Kocan and Hickisch 1986; Toce et al 1987; Silvestre et al 1996) (but there were different GRVs used), with one study finding a higher GRV in the continuously fed group (Schanler et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present time practice appears to be based more on individual assessment rather than on scientific evidence. Continuous feeding may reduce energy expenditure [45] and improve feeding tolerance, nutrient adsorption and growth [46]; on the other hand, intermittent bolus method may be more physiologic, promoting the cyclical pattern of release of gastrointestinal hormones, which are important for gut development [47]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods used are continuous milk infusion and intermittent, or bolus, milk delivery (usually every 3 hours). 12 Data from studies in older infants with intestinal disease suggest that the continuous tube-feeding method is associated with better nutrient absorption than the bolus method. 13 However, recent studies have questioned these results for growing premature infants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%