2019
DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteral nutrition better than proton pump inhibitors?

Abstract: Purpose of review Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically-ill patients has been a subject of extensive research, with multiple clinical trials attempting to study the best method of stress ulcer prophylaxis with the least adverse effects. Until recently, pharmacologic prophylaxis has prevailed as the primary choice for the prevention of stress ulcers but recent clinical studies have attempted to evaluate the role of enteral nutrition in stress ulcer prophylaxis. Rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several related questions are currently subject to ongoing research including comparing early trophic EN with no EN in the first 24 h [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Question 2: What About En In Patients Receiving Vasopressor Agents?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several related questions are currently subject to ongoing research including comparing early trophic EN with no EN in the first 24 h [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Question 2: What About En In Patients Receiving Vasopressor Agents?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our results, we believe that PPIs may not be appropriate for patients at low risk of UGIB. We recommend further clinical trials on large cohorts of patients to evaluate the benefits of using PPI in critically ill patients at low risk of UGIB 23 . Better identification of appropriate selection criteria for PPI and comparisons of pharmacologic prevention strategies are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Accordingly, there is a lack of agreement in clinical practice regarding the use of pharmacological SUP in relation to enteral feed, leading to variation in practice and calls for larger clinical trials. 17 The SUP in the intensive care unit (SUP-ICU) trial was an international, blinded randomised controlled trial comparing the effects of prophylactic intravenous pantoprazole versus placebo on patientimportant outcomes in 3298 adult ICU patients at risk of GI bleeding. 18 There was no overall statistically significant difference between groups in the primary outcome of mortality (31.1% vs. 30.4%, relative risk (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, there is a lack of agreement in clinical practice regarding the use of pharmacological SUP in relation to enteral feed, leading to variation in practice and calls for larger clinical trials 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%