The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
54
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions of the two meta-analyses, one of which reported on six studies (181) and the other on two of the six studies (180), were contradictory. In one, enteral nutrition was favored versus TPN (180); in the other, the interpretation was that there were insufficient data to provide firm conclusions about the safety and efficacy of enteral nutrition when compared to TPN (181).…”
Section: Level Of Evidence: IImentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conclusions of the two meta-analyses, one of which reported on six studies (181) and the other on two of the six studies (180), were contradictory. In one, enteral nutrition was favored versus TPN (180); in the other, the interpretation was that there were insufficient data to provide firm conclusions about the safety and efficacy of enteral nutrition when compared to TPN (181).…”
Section: Level Of Evidence: IImentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All have included relatively few patients (median 33, range 17-53) that have differed considerably in entry criteria. There have been other methodologic concerns that have been well outlined in two meta-analyses (180,181). In general, it is reasonable to conclude that enteral feeding is safer and less expensive than TPN, but there is not yet convincing findings that there are major improvements in morbidity and mortality of acute pancreatitis.…”
Section: Level Of Evidence: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li (1998) have proven that the function of rat intestinal barrier will be significantly weakened after TPN supportive treatment, and 100% bacteria translocation will occur if there is a hemorrhagic shock. The early enteral nutuition (EN) might be indispensable to the protection of intestinal mucosa barrier of rats (Al-Omran et al, 2003;Marik and Zaloga, 2004). Grady et al(2000) found that PAF played an important role in the progression of pancreatitis complicated with functional disturbance of intestinal mucosa barrier.…”
Section: Influence Of Enteral Nutrition Deficiency On Injury Of Intesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diet should not necessarily be liquid or semi-liquid, but should be low-fat and low residue. 126,127 In severe cases, artificial feeding is necessary with endoscopic or radiological positioning of naso-jejunal tube (preferred) and enteral nutrition formulas rich in protein and low in fat (with a caloric need of 25 kcal/kg of ideal weight). This approach allows, with respect to the total parenteral nutrition (TPN), to maintain the integrity of the intestinal barrier, to reduce the risk of intestinal atrophy and bacterial/fungal translocation and to reduce the risk of sepsis related to the use of central venous access (CVC) and TPN.…”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%