2006
DOI: 10.2310/7060.2005.12507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteric Fever in Israeli Travelers: A Nationwide Study

Abstract: Among Israeli travelers S. typhi infection is declining whereas S. paratyphi A is increasing, with most cases occurring in vaccinated travelers. Prior typhoid vaccination did not modify the course of the disease. S. paratyphi A infection in travelers is not milder than S. typhi infection. Although this is not a prospective, controlled, randomized trial, it appears that the Ty21a vaccine may be less effective for S. typhi but may offer some protection against S. paratyphi A. Sequential vaccination with the avai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations from a large randomized placebo-controlled field trial in Plaju, Indonesia, strongly suggested that Ty21a is unable to confer cross-protection against S. Paratyphi A infection (57). In contrast, a retrospective study by Meltzer et al among travelers from Israel to the Indian subcontinent suggested that Ty21a might confer some protection against S. Paratyphi A (42). However, in a subsequent report the authors stated that current typhoid vaccines offer no protection against S. Paratyphi A (43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations from a large randomized placebo-controlled field trial in Plaju, Indonesia, strongly suggested that Ty21a is unable to confer cross-protection against S. Paratyphi A infection (57). In contrast, a retrospective study by Meltzer et al among travelers from Israel to the Indian subcontinent suggested that Ty21a might confer some protection against S. Paratyphi A (42). However, in a subsequent report the authors stated that current typhoid vaccines offer no protection against S. Paratyphi A (43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the period 1989-2004, S. Typhi strains carrying an R factor encoding resistance to several clinically relevant antibiotics (chloramphenicol, amoxicillin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) emerged and disseminated throughout South and Southeast Asia [3]. As the Asian pandemic of multidrug-resistant typhoid diminished in the early twentyfirst century, paratyphoid fever caused by S. Paratyphi A became increasingly common [4] and also emerged as a problem among travelers to Asia [5]. This changing epidemiologic profile has rekindled interest in vaccines to prevent paratyphoid fever.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Mermin et al (1998) describing the epidemiological patterns of imported cases of enteric fever into USA, it was shown that between 1985 and 1994, the incidence among travellers to the Indian subcontinent increased from 23.4 to 81.2 per 100,000. In a study from Israel, 74 % of imported typhoid fever cases were acquired in India and the calculated attack rate was 24 per 100,000 travellers, which is 100 times a higher figure when compared to Thailand or to the Middle East (Meltzer et al 2005;Connor and Schwartz 2005). Our findings underline the fact that Indian subcontinent is a high-risk destination in this respect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Our study was significantly limited by relatively low number of cases, and there have been no identified statistically significant differences between typhoid and paratyphoid cases, except from the elevation of liver function parameters in S. Typhi cases. Similarly, other studies neither found the clinical difference between typhoid and paratyphoid fever, nor confirmed that paratyphoid fever had milder clinical course (Clark et al 2010;Patel et al 2010;Meltzer et al 2005;Shlim et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%