2010
DOI: 10.1068/d10409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entering a Risky Territory: Space in the Age of Digital Navigation

Abstract: Relying on the fecund interface of three fields—studies in science, risk geography, and knowledge management—this paper notes first that the lack of understanding of the relationships between maps and territory and risks is an unfortunate consequence of the way the mapping impulse has been interpreted during the modernist period. Then, taking into account the advent of digital navigation, the paper discusses a very different interpretation of the mapping enterprise that allows a mimetic use of maps to be disti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online applications for data analysis and visualisation, that is, enable dynamic, and arguably 'topological' renderings of controversy (November and Latour, 2010;Scharnhorst and Wouters, 2006 (Callon et al, 1983;Leydersdorff, 1996). In order to map the 'frame expansions' on technology occurring in controversies, they produced visualisations of the unfolding relations between heterogeneous actors and terms caught up in public controversy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online applications for data analysis and visualisation, that is, enable dynamic, and arguably 'topological' renderings of controversy (November and Latour, 2010;Scharnhorst and Wouters, 2006 (Callon et al, 1983;Leydersdorff, 1996). In order to map the 'frame expansions' on technology occurring in controversies, they produced visualisations of the unfolding relations between heterogeneous actors and terms caught up in public controversy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, one has to navigate through successive signposts using interactive devices. This can be explained further by following critical cartography, and by turning to a navigational approach to the understanding of maps that is fundamentally different with regard to its notion of representation (NOVEMBER et al 2010). This puts an emphasis on a constructivist approach to map theory echoing de Certeau and Lefebvre who consider space not as fixed, but as the outcome of a negotiation process between naturalising strategies and opposing tactics (FINK 2012).…”
Section: What Does Technology Do?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And nowadays the cartographic image is just one visualisation among many. For example, while planning a route or navigating through space printing out a map remains one option, using a list of directives poses another (NOVEMBER et al 2010). This goes along with the challenge to extend the view on map use by general questions concerning the broader institutional culture of geomedia.…”
Section: From Isolated Tests To Situated Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…November et al 2010). Digital map users are not just reading maps, but are also to a far greater extent constantly influencing the shape and look of the map itself.…”
Section: Where Was I?mentioning
confidence: 99%