2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterobacterial tumor colonization in mice depends on bacterial metabolism and macrophages but is independent of chemotaxis and motility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the process of bacterial tumor targeting is not entirely clear, macrophage was reported not to be a transporter of bacteria to tumor, and depleting macrophages did not affect tumor colonization [36]. Our results further confirmed this finding because the mutants with reduced survival within macrophages reached the same accumulation level in tumors as VNP20009.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the process of bacterial tumor targeting is not entirely clear, macrophage was reported not to be a transporter of bacteria to tumor, and depleting macrophages did not affect tumor colonization [36]. Our results further confirmed this finding because the mutants with reduced survival within macrophages reached the same accumulation level in tumors as VNP20009.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results further confirmed this finding because the mutants with reduced survival within macrophages reached the same accumulation level in tumors as VNP20009. In addition, S. enterica was found both intracellular and extracellular in the tumor, where immune surveillance fails to function [36]. Three days post infection, when the bacterial titer reached the highest level in the tumor, all the mutants reached the same accumulation level in tumor as VNP20009 because the growth and replication rates of the mutants within melanoma cells were not impaired [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports about the role of motility in bacterial penetration and accumulation in tumors, however, have been contradictory. It has been shown for some bacterial strains that the extent of bacterial accumulation in tumors is independent of motility 3940 . Some non-motile bacteria have been shown to have better transport properties through porous surfaces than motile bacteria 41 , possibly because of lesser probability of collision with pore surfaces 4142 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a VNP20009 mutant strain lacking the chemoreceptor Trg was observed to penetrate further into tumors than the parental strain (Zhang and Forbes, 2015). Conversely, it has been reported in a mouse model system that tumor colonization by Escherichia coli Nissle is independent of both bacterial chemotaxis and motility (Stritzker et al, 2010). Furthermore, murine tumor colonization of non-motile and non-chemotactic Salmonella strains was found to be comparable to wild type 24 h after infection (Crull et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%