Enterobius vermicularis as a Novel Surrogate for the Presence of Helminth Ova in Tertiary Wastewater Treatment Plants

Abstract

Significant effort has gone into assessing the fate and removal of viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites during wastewater treatment to provide data addressing potential health risks associated with reuse options. Comparatively less is known about the fate of parasitic worm species ova in these complex systems. It is largely assumed that these helminths settle, are removed with the sludge, and consequently represent a relatively low risk for wastewater reuse applications. However, helminths are a highly diverse group of organisms that display a wide range of physical properties that complicate the application of a single treatment for helminth reduction during wastewater treatment. Moreover, their diverse biological and physical properties make some ova highly resistant to both disinfection (i.e., with chlorine or UV treatment) and physical removal (settling) through the wastewater treatment train, indicating that there may be reason to broaden the scope of our investigations into whether parasitic worm eggs can be identified in treated wastewater. The ubiquitous human parasitic nematode Enterobius vermicularis (pinworm) produces small, buoyant ova. Utilizing a novel diagnostic quantitative PCR (qPCR), this study monitored E. vermicularis presence at two full-scale wastewater treatment plants over the course of 8 months and demonstrated incomplete physical removal of E. vermicularis ova through tertiary treatment, with removal efficiencies approximating only 0.5 and 1.6 log 10 at the two wastewater treatment plants based on qPCR. These findings demonstrate the need for more-diverse surrogates of helminthic ova to fully assess treatment performance with respect to reclaimed wastewaters.IMPORTANCE Helminths, despite being a diverse and environmentally resistant class of pathogens, are often underestimated and ignored when treatment performance at modern wastewater treatment plants is considered. A one-size-fits-all surrogate for removal of helminth ova may be inappropriate to adequately assess risk and ensure public safety when treated and partially treated wastewaters are encountered. This study argues for the use of human pinworm as a conservative indicator of the presence of helminth ova due to its small size, buoyancy, prevalence in humans, and environmental resistance.KEYWORDS Enterobius, helminth, monitoring, ova, qPCR, wastewater W ater serves as a medium for the transmission of many species of parasitic protozoa and helminths (1, 2). Contamination of water sources by parasites (and other causative agents of gastrointestinal illness) often occurs when sewage containing human waste is improperly treated (2, 3). Drinking, irrigation, recreation, and numerous

Democratizing water monitoring: Implementation of a community-based qPCR monitoring program for recreational water hazards

“…Inhibition controls. Inhibition controls were performed utilizing the inhibition control assay described in Rudko et al (2017) [24]. Internal control plasmid DNA was spiked in excess into qPCR reactions containing 5μL of water sample DNA, and inhibition was defined as a 3-ct (i.e.…”

Pathogen performance testing of a natural swimming pool using a cocktail of microbiological surrogates and QMRA-derived management goals

“…Performance surrogates are used to assess the efficacy of a treatment process to remove the three classes of waterborne pathogens: viruses, bacteria, and protozoa (WHO 2016;Zimmerman et al 2016). Given the potential presence of pathogenic viruses (Jiang 2006;Sinclair et al 2009), bacteria (Caskey et al 2018;Leoni et al 2018), and parasitic protozoa (Pintar et al 2010) in recreational waters, it is important to understand the reduction/inactivation kinetics of all three groups and potentially, those of helminth ova and fungal spores (Rudko et al 2017). While performance testing using surrogates (indigenous or spiked-in) has become a more common practice to validate pathogen reductions associated with water reuse, its application to bathing waters is limited.…”