1973
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterovirus Surveillance Following a Communitywide Oral Poliovirus Vaccination Program: A Seven-Year Study 12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data suggest that sewage can be an effective indicator for the presence of enterovirus, adenovirus and reovirus in the community in contrast with faeces surveys which have not been found to fulfill this role satisfactorily (Wilterdink, 1970;Horstmann, 1973). The study of less polluted river waters does not yield as much epidemiological information as does sewage but this may be a result of the different techniques employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data suggest that sewage can be an effective indicator for the presence of enterovirus, adenovirus and reovirus in the community in contrast with faeces surveys which have not been found to fulfill this role satisfactorily (Wilterdink, 1970;Horstmann, 1973). The study of less polluted river waters does not yield as much epidemiological information as does sewage but this may be a result of the different techniques employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Surveys of the viruses in sewage have been made in the United States (Horstmann, 1973;Bloom, 1959;Lamb, 1964), in Sweden (B6ttiger, 1973 and in Israel (Fattal, 1977). One survey of reovirus in sewage was done in England (Craske, 1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of highest sewage content range from 1 WPV/100 ml to 1 WPV/6,000 ml sewage during eight epidemics in medium to large European and U.S. cities. ( 133 ) Poliovirus recovery from sewage usually involves some form of virus entrapment ( 26,82 ) or sample concentration, ( 40,54,226 ) commonly from 50‐ to 100‐fold. Virus recovery is occasionally reported from unconcentrated samples, ( 171 ) but WPV concentrations in raw sewage are typically <1 CCID 50 /ml.…”
Section: Infectious and Potential Infectious Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horstmann et al . ( 82 ) described the results of a pre‐licensure study of OPV involving 19 children who received OPV in Portland (a city of 4,000). Assuming an average daily sewage flow of 100 liters/person/day ( 226 ) yields an estimated total flow of approximately 10 5 liters/day, or approximately 0.5% of the Helsinki flow over less than one‐quarter of the distance.…”
Section: Community Risk Of Facility‐associated Poliovirus Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of a 70-fold increase in the number of vacci nated individuals in one community who were shedding virus, all sewage samples from both communities were positive for this virus. 13 These findings indicate that viruses can be readily detected in sewage although the number of people infected in a community may be small. In other studies one or more types of virus have been isolated from almost all samples of sewage, effluent of primary settling, and activated sludge.…”
Section: Viruses In the Water Environmentmentioning
confidence: 97%