2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise knowledge management model based on China’s practice and case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As, both tacit and explicit knowledge if managed through proper strategy, may become a key resource of competitive advantage (Sanchez, Marin, & Morales, 2015). Moreover, knowledge related to profitability and competitiveness inside and outside the organization is of being imperfectly known (Zhao et al, 2012). This study fills the research gap by focusing on the external source of explicit and tacit knowledge.…”
Section: External-knowledge Management (E-km)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As, both tacit and explicit knowledge if managed through proper strategy, may become a key resource of competitive advantage (Sanchez, Marin, & Morales, 2015). Moreover, knowledge related to profitability and competitiveness inside and outside the organization is of being imperfectly known (Zhao et al, 2012). This study fills the research gap by focusing on the external source of explicit and tacit knowledge.…”
Section: External-knowledge Management (E-km)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers who use this second approach are focused on the creation of knowledge management system frameworks. These frameworks (Zhao et al, 2012) attempt to explain how Web 2.0 technologies should function together as a system to help the organizations to get the most out of their knowledge resources. In this paper, we are closer to the holistic approach as we study particular technologies in the function of inclusion into the knowledge management system framework.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, lack of strategic planning regarding KM adoption [30,46], lack of roles and responsibilities [94], lack of fund for KM system development [93,95], lack of top management commitment [33], lack of clear understanding of KM adoption [96,97] or insufficient integration with business process [93,94].…”
Section: Review Of Literature Regarding Knowledge Management Process mentioning
confidence: 99%