Enterprise Restructuring in Belarus

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit company supported by Deutsche Post World Net. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its research networks, research support, and visitors and doctoral programs. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ABSTRACT Enterprise Restructuring in Belarus *We explore the impact of privatization and the entry of new firms on enterprise performance in Belarus, a transition economy in which reform and market-orientated institutional development has been limited. We hypothesize that private ownership will enhance company performance, measured in a variety of ways including profitability and capacity to export to the West, and that newly created firms will perform better than state-owned ones. Our work is based on a large enterprise level survey which includes state-owned firms, privatized companies and newly created enterprises. The data refute both hypotheses. We conclude that this is probably because the institutional environment has not evolved sufficiently from the socialist era to permit free competition and effective governance by new owners.JEL Classification: P2, P31, L1

Building an authoritarian regime: Strategies for autocratisation and resistance in Belarus and Slovakia

“…Poor protection of property rights further hindered the development of an autonomous private business. The laws and institutions did not enable free competition and effective private management (Bakanova et al, 2006). State support to parochial state factories crowded out private investment and raised the cost of credit coming from private banks.…”

Struggling to Be Heard: The Past and Present of Employee Voice in Belarus

“…In Belarus, the management does not see the need to hide behind worker participation schemes. Unlike Russia, where a large proportion of enterprises are private and capitalist employment relations prevail, Belarusian industry remains under a tight grip of the state which has become the largest inconspicuous employer in the country as a result of indirect re-nationalisation of industry through 'faked privatisation' (Bakanova et al, 2006;Pastore and Verashchagina, 2006).…”

Compulsory reduced working time in Belarus: Incidence, operation and consequences

“…In the century's early years, the government's position was that 'shock therapy' or rapid transitions were to be avoided; living standards were to be improved as market disciplines were slowly introduced and labour collectives preserved as far as possible. 'Privatisation' has therefore been formal with the state retaining control of major companies (Bakanova et al, 2006;Pastore and at Middlesex University on January 13, 2016 eid.sagepub.com Downloaded from Verashchagina, 2006;Vankevich et al, 2008). For the decade down to 2006, the settlement was underpinned by growth assisted by preferential access to Russian markets prior to a slowdown in production and exports in subsequent years (Favaro et al, 2012).…”