Enterprise Risk Management in Europe 2021
DOI: 10.1108/978-1-83867-245-420211003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise Risk Management in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is however at variance with studies by da Silva et al, (2019), Witjaksono & Sari, (2021, and others on one hand, and those of ), Shad et al, (2022, etc, on the other who found the effect of ERM on firm performance to be negative, and positive respectively at statistically significant levels. This finding should be of interest to the regulator as it aligns with those of previous studies that pointed at regulatory compliance as a catalyst for ERM adoption and the consequent tendency for superficial engagement (Adeyele & Maiturare, (2021), Grammenidis & Hiebl, (2021). ERMI which measured ERM implementation had a negative effect on ROA (0.166), and the effect is considered statistically significant since the p-value is 0.001.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is however at variance with studies by da Silva et al, (2019), Witjaksono & Sari, (2021, and others on one hand, and those of ), Shad et al, (2022, etc, on the other who found the effect of ERM on firm performance to be negative, and positive respectively at statistically significant levels. This finding should be of interest to the regulator as it aligns with those of previous studies that pointed at regulatory compliance as a catalyst for ERM adoption and the consequent tendency for superficial engagement (Adeyele & Maiturare, (2021), Grammenidis & Hiebl, (2021). ERMI which measured ERM implementation had a negative effect on ROA (0.166), and the effect is considered statistically significant since the p-value is 0.001.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%