2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-021-03873-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise service composition models in IoT context: solutions comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A. Souri et al [43] presented a hybrid formal verification approach to assess the service composition in multicloud environments targeted at reducing the number of clouds of a service request and meeting the required level of quality of service (QoS). Other service composition methods we introduce in "Simulation and comparisons" section include All-C [44][45][46], Bas-C [44][45][46], Smt-C [44][45][46], Swm-C [47], and Fast-C [48].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A. Souri et al [43] presented a hybrid formal verification approach to assess the service composition in multicloud environments targeted at reducing the number of clouds of a service request and meeting the required level of quality of service (QoS). Other service composition methods we introduce in "Simulation and comparisons" section include All-C [44][45][46], Bas-C [44][45][46], Smt-C [44][45][46], Swm-C [47], and Fast-C [48].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will compare our method GA-C with All-C [44][45][46], Bas-C [44][45][46], Smt-C [44][45][46], Swm-C [47], and Fast-C [48].…”
Section: Simulation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Technical aspect, the sub-aspects previously discussed include service composition in the cloud [6] and industrial environments [196], composition service types, attributes, domains of application [3], composition planning and strategies [11] [195] [228], composition platforms [213], and composition models, techniques, and tools [177] [217]. However, none of these efforts have addressed some Technical sub-aspects, including stakeholders' concerns regarding service composition (RQ5).…”
Section: B Technical Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOGAF is a more popular EA framework among others as it is easy to understand and provides a clear process for implementation (Bouafia and Molnár, 2019; Anggraini et al , 2019). It is used by most of the organizations to develop business values and proficiency, and provides a global approach for designing suitable services (Safaei et al , 2022). It has been found as the most reliable EA in the world in which 80% of the companies from the list of 50 global companies use it (Kotusev, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%