2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2015.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpies and heat capacities of solution of racemic N-methyl-substituted glycolurils in water at T=(278.15 to 313.15)K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a conclusion is confirmed by the fact that the contribution (increment) of the CH 2 group to the standard molar heat capacity of hydration, Δ solv C p,2 o , has been found to be the same (δ C p,2 o ≈ 34.2 J•mol −1 •K −1 at T = 298.15 K) too, regardless of the methylation character within a specified series: MMGU < trans-DMGU < TriMGU (< Mebicar). 6 Moreover, all the glycoluril derivatives studied (including Mebicar) dissolve in water with endothermic effect decreasing abruptly in magnitude on going from MMGU (24.0 kJ•mol −1 ) to TriMGU (5.9 kJ•mol −1 at T = 298.15 K). 6 The given fact suggests that the interaction of each of the considered chiral glycoluril derivatives with surrounding water is weaker than the interaction between the solute molecules in its own crystal phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such a conclusion is confirmed by the fact that the contribution (increment) of the CH 2 group to the standard molar heat capacity of hydration, Δ solv C p,2 o , has been found to be the same (δ C p,2 o ≈ 34.2 J•mol −1 •K −1 at T = 298.15 K) too, regardless of the methylation character within a specified series: MMGU < trans-DMGU < TriMGU (< Mebicar). 6 Moreover, all the glycoluril derivatives studied (including Mebicar) dissolve in water with endothermic effect decreasing abruptly in magnitude on going from MMGU (24.0 kJ•mol −1 ) to TriMGU (5.9 kJ•mol −1 at T = 298.15 K). 6 The given fact suggests that the interaction of each of the considered chiral glycoluril derivatives with surrounding water is weaker than the interaction between the solute molecules in its own crystal phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It may be connected with the different ability of stereochemically distinguishable molecular forms of a glycoluril molecule to hydrogen bonding with water at the expense of proton-acceptor (C = O) groups and proton-donor (N−H and HC−CH) moieties. [6][7][8]32,37,38 One can assume that V 2 o (T) for the chiral (racemic) glycoluril derivatives being studied here, similarly to Nmethyl-substituted acyclic ureas, is influenced by the following: 7,34 (i) an intrinsic contribution from each CH 3 group, (ii) a hydrophobic contribution caused by a molecule sequential methylation, (iii) a hindrance for hydrogen bonding due to an N-methylated position, and a possible decrease in ability to form CO•••H bonds as well. According to the trend of sequential increase in V 2 o expressed by eq 3, the first two of the mentioned effects are to be perhaps most important in the case considered here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations