2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2012.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpies of formation for organosulfur compounds: Atomization energy and hypohomodesmotic reaction schemes via ab initio composite methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Linear alkanes (C n H 2n + 2 for n = 1–8) were considered in a second CPU timing study to assess the effect of systematically increasing the molecule size on the CPU time and energetics within the ccCA framework. ΔH f for linear alkanes are computed with the atomization approach and with isodesmic schemes for C n H 2n + 2 for n = 3–8 since using isodesmic schemes have been shown to reduce the error for computed ΔH f for linear alkanes and other organic species . The isodesmic schemes are shown in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear alkanes (C n H 2n + 2 for n = 1–8) were considered in a second CPU timing study to assess the effect of systematically increasing the molecule size on the CPU time and energetics within the ccCA framework. ΔH f for linear alkanes are computed with the atomization approach and with isodesmic schemes for C n H 2n + 2 for n = 3–8 since using isodesmic schemes have been shown to reduce the error for computed ΔH f for linear alkanes and other organic species . The isodesmic schemes are shown in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calculating the enthalpies of formation, ccCA-S3 provides the lowest MAD (1.4 kcal mol -1 with respect to the reference data; 0.9 kcal mol -1 excluding FOOF) without any parameterized energies. While ccCA-S3 provides the smallest MAD of the four different CBS extrapolation formulas considered for this set of molecules, other ccCA variants, such as ccCA-PS3, have been found to be useful in previous studies [44,54]. G3 and G3B3 achieved a MAD that is greater than ccCA-S3 by only 0.1 kcal mol -1 with respect to the reference data while incorporating an empirical parameter that is intended to reduce the overall MAD of G3 and G3B3 (or MAD of 0.9 kcal mol -1 excluding FOOF, which is identical to ccCA-S3 in this case).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…G3 and G3B3 are used here, largely, as they were included in the Mayer and Kass study [48]. Though G4 is a more modern method, beginning with an MP4 reference energy is a costly start, and as shown in previous studies, G4 predicts very similar energies as G3 [54,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured values of enthalpy of formation (∆H • ) of compounds were collected from literature sources. Several papers [9,[14][15][16][17][20][21][22]24,25] provide compilations of ∆H • as part of studies of the prediction of ∆H • using a variety of methods. For this study, only data for stable molecules were collected.…”
Section: Measured Enthalpy Of Formation (∆H • ) Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%