1959
DOI: 10.1042/bj0710395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpies of hydrolysis of glutamine and asparagine and of ionization of glutamic and aspartic acids

Abstract: BIVALENT METAL COMPLEXES OF ATP AND ADP 395 4. The results also indicate the formation of a ternary complex between magnesium, adenosine triphosphate and 8-hydroxyquinoline.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1960
1960
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of the calorimetric results shows that the value of r H o m for reaction (5) obtained from the study of Kitzinger and Hems (21) differs from the result of the present study by 4.2 kJ · mol −1 . Also, the value of r H o m for reaction (6) obtained by them (21) is in dis-agreement by 5.6 kJ · mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examination of the calorimetric results shows that the value of r H o m for reaction (5) obtained from the study of Kitzinger and Hems (21) differs from the result of the present study by 4.2 kJ · mol −1 . Also, the value of r H o m for reaction (6) obtained by them (21) is in dis-agreement by 5.6 kJ · mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Also, the value of r H o m for reaction (6) obtained by them (21) is in dis-agreement by 5.6 kJ · mol −1 . In both cases, the results of the earlier studies are less exothermic than the results of the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We found no results in the literature for D r C p,m for reaction (5) or (6) for either amino acid. Figure 8 shows D r H m (T, m) for reactions (5) and (6) together with values from the literature [19,[31][32][33][34][35][36][40][41][42][43][52][53][54]. The differences between our values of D r H m (T, m) for reaction (5) and those from the literature The ± values are from propagation of uncertainties as described in reference [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Reference values used for integration constants in this report for L-aspartic acid at T * = 298.15 are pK a = (1.95 3 ± 0.09 1 ) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and [31][32][33][34][35][36] for reaction (5), and pK a = (3.7 6 ± 0.1 0 ) [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][37][38][39][40] and D r H m ¼ ð4:8 5 AE 0:9 0 Þ kJ Á mol À1 [32][33][34][35]41] for reaction (6). Reference values used for L-glutamic acid at T * = 298.15 are pK a = (2.19 5 ± 0.08 9 ) [25][26]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider in greater detail the two reactions in which the amide bonds of asparagine and glutamine are hydrolyzed [65][66][67][68]71]: "0 NHj I = -02C-CH-CH2-CHz-COz +NHt (9) (L-glutamate) LlH r = -21.8 kJ mol-i ; LlG r = -11.7 kJ mol-i. Glycine-lysine -8.8±O.3 [67] As expected, the structurally similar compounds aspargine and glutamine have similar thermodynamic parameters for the hydrolysis reactions.…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of Enzymatic Reactions Catalyzed By Hydrolasesmentioning
confidence: 99%