2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1475333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthalpies of Sublimation of Organic and Organometallic Compounds. 1910–2001

Abstract: A compendium of sublimation enthalpies, published within the period 1910-2001 ͑over 1200 references͒, is reported. A brief review of the temperature adjustments for the sublimation enthalpies from the temperature of measurement to the standard reference temperature, 298.15 K, is included, as are recently suggested values for several reference materials. Sublimation enthalpies are included for organic, organometallic, and a few inorganic compounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
450
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 516 publications
(479 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
25
450
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This remains in the −43 to −47 kJ mol −1 experimental range which we favored in our earlier publication 1 due to several values being reported in this range. 59,60 The lattice energy of −51.6 kJ mol −1 also compares well to Beran's analysis 17 of the experimental data, deducing lattice energies of −52 ± 3 kJ mol −1 based on the experimental sublimation energies. Nevertheless, we expect the magnitude of the lattice energy to be slightly underestimated due to the neglect of two-body interactions beyond 9.4 Å in our earlier study.…”
Section: Scs-ccsd Scs(mi)-ccsd Ccsd(t) Scs-ccsd Error Scs(mi)-ccsd Errorsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This remains in the −43 to −47 kJ mol −1 experimental range which we favored in our earlier publication 1 due to several values being reported in this range. 59,60 The lattice energy of −51.6 kJ mol −1 also compares well to Beran's analysis 17 of the experimental data, deducing lattice energies of −52 ± 3 kJ mol −1 based on the experimental sublimation energies. Nevertheless, we expect the magnitude of the lattice energy to be slightly underestimated due to the neglect of two-body interactions beyond 9.4 Å in our earlier study.…”
Section: Scs-ccsd Scs(mi)-ccsd Ccsd(t) Scs-ccsd Error Scs(mi)-ccsd Errorsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The latter data were determined by either direct calorimetric methods or calculated on the basis of the temperature dependence of measured infinite dilution activity coefficient data, and the published values were converted to gas-to-water and/or gas-to-octanol enthalpies of transfer by subtracting the solute's standard molar enthalpy of vaporization, 70 ∆ Vap H 298K°, or standard molar enthalpy of sublimation, 71 ∆ Sub H 298K°, at 298.15 K.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal contribution was evaluated at 298 K, the temperature to which most sublimation enthalpies are extrapolated. 54,55 The application of density functional perturbation theory 51 is not possible as it would require a fully self-consistent implementation of the TS vdW term, which is not currently available in the CASTEP code. The vibrational quantities for isolated molecules were also determined using phonon calculations.…”
Section: Estimation Of Vibrational Contributions To Sublimation Enmentioning
confidence: 99%