2013
DOI: 10.2478/s12175-013-0168-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entire functions sharing sets of small functions with their difference operators or shifts

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We show some interesting results concerning entire functions sharing two sets of small functions CM with their difference operators or shifts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the use of almost the same method, we omit the detailed proof. A similar result can be found in [11]. Before we proceed, we suppose that the reader is familiar with Nevanlinna theory, for example, the first and second main theorems, and the common notations such as T(r, f ), m(r, f ) and N(r, f ).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the use of almost the same method, we omit the detailed proof. A similar result can be found in [11]. Before we proceed, we suppose that the reader is familiar with Nevanlinna theory, for example, the first and second main theorems, and the common notations such as T(r, f ), m(r, f ) and N(r, f ).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In recent years, the Nevanlinna characteristic of f (z + ω), the value distribution theory for difference polynomials, the Nevanlinna theory of the difference operator and the difference analogue of the lemma on the logarithmic derivative had been established; see e.g. [2,10,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Due to these theories, there has been recent study of whether the derivative f can be replaced by the difference operator c f (z) = f (z + c)f (z) in the above question.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] the author posed an open question: "What happens if in Theorem 1.1, {a, −a} is replaced by {a(z), b(z)} where a(z), b(z) ∈ S(f ) are two non-vanishing periodic functions with period c?" Chen-Chen [2] answered the question of Liu [7] in the following way:…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of Theorem 1.3, it will be natural to investigate whether in the same theorem, the set {0} can be replaced by {b(z)}, where b(z) is non-zero periodic small function of f . In this respect, we would first like to mention the following contribution due to Chen-Chen [2].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation