1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.49.932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrance channel effects in the fusion-fission time scales from studies of prescission neutron multiplicities

Abstract: Prescission neutron multiplicities in fusion-fission reactions of B+ Np, B+ Th, C+ Th, and 0+ Th, lying on either side of the Businaro-Gallone mass asymmetry (uso), have been measured. The present data along with those available in literature for compound systems spanning the fissility range from 0.70 to 0.84 were analyzed in a consistent manner to deduce fusion-fission time scales for all systems. From the systematic behavior of all the data, the three components of total dynamical fusion-fission delay, namel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily this task becomes one of identifying quasifission, the re-separation of the contacting nuclei before moving inside the fission saddle point. There the product of the atomic numbers of the reacting nuclei, Z 1 Z 2 , exceeds 1600 [1,16,[18][19][20][21] and (c) when the asymmetry, α, of the reacting system is less than the mass asymmetry associated with the Businaro-Gallone point [22][23][24][25][26]. Unfortunately there are known exceptions to each of these general rules, i.e., (a) [24,27,28] (b) [29][30][31] (c) [31,32].…”
Section: B Reaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily this task becomes one of identifying quasifission, the re-separation of the contacting nuclei before moving inside the fission saddle point. There the product of the atomic numbers of the reacting nuclei, Z 1 Z 2 , exceeds 1600 [1,16,[18][19][20][21] and (c) when the asymmetry, α, of the reacting system is less than the mass asymmetry associated with the Businaro-Gallone point [22][23][24][25][26]. Unfortunately there are known exceptions to each of these general rules, i.e., (a) [24,27,28] (b) [29][30][31] (c) [31,32].…”
Section: B Reaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12)). The effect of damping manifests itself in the hindrance of the fission mode as compared to the particle emission channels and therefore, in anomalously large pre-scission particle multiplicities in the fission process [5,[17][18][19][20]. The observed excess in the pre-scission particle multiplicities has been used to deduce the dynamical delay in the fission decay arising due to coupling of the intrinsic excitation energy to the collective kinetic energy in the fission mode.…”
Section: Heavy Ion Fusion-fission Excitation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This has significance for the direction of mass drift between the two sides of a dinuclear system produced in a heavy ion collision process. While the exact dynamical path of mass equilibration followed by the system is governed by both the potential energy and the initial kinetics of the many body nuclear system, the influence of BG point in the fusion-fission time scales and shape equilibration has been demonstrated in many recent experiments and by the detailed dynamical calculations [5,6]. In the present review, we shall deal with some selected aspects of heavy ion induced fission reactions with special emphasis on our recent experimental findings, which have important implications on the dynamics of the fusion-fission process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental observations of large scale damping of the collective modes in fission process leading to large dynamical delays in fission decay have led to extensive studies earlier in this field [1][2][3][4]. Recently, there have been observations of anomalous anisotropies in the angular distributions of the fission fragments in comparison to the standard saddle point statistical model (SSPSM) predictions in a large number of target-projectile systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%