“…In this study, only tweets published in Spanish were considered, as it is the official language of the Spanish territory and the one used in the national political debate, beyond each group's regional scope and political profile (Table 1). Guided by the findings of authors such as Corujo et al (2019), Carratalá and Palau‐Sampio (2019), who are based on others (Gould & Messina, 2014), the common elements associated with the different political groups in this work include the following: (1) the territorial presence being limited or not to a substate level; (2) the level to which self‐government within the Spanish political system is or is not supported; (3) the appeal or not to identity or territoriality (more or less) exclusive to the group. These aspects were taken into consideration, although recognizing the different nuances of each group studied, to categorize them into three blocks that would help approach the proposed topic: - Pro‐independence political groups, with a territorial presence limited to a substate level, focused more on political arguments oriented towards self‐government claims and, to a lesser extent, on the identity or territoriality of the geographical area where they exercise their political action.
- Nationalist political groups, with a territorial presence limited to a substate level, focused more on connecting their voters through arguments oriented towards identity or territoriality and, to a lesser extent, towards self‐government.
- Constitutionalist political groups, with a territorial presence both at the substate and state levels (the entire country), with political arguments far removed from any form of self‐government, focused on the splitting of the current political system, and more aimed at establishing connections with their voters from a vision of identity and territoriality in Spanish and Spain (as a nation), above other forms of existing regional representation.
…”