2012
DOI: 10.1515/9783110294002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrenchment in Usage-Based Theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As Langacker (1987) comments, “Every use of a structure has a positive impact on its degree of entrenchment” (p. 57). Entrenchment has been employed to explain L1 development (Blumenthal-Dramé, 2012), predicting that repeated use of a linguistic form in one structure minimizes the possibility that this form could be used in another structure (Braine & Brooks, 1995). For instance, repeated occurrences of fall in I / you fall and she / he falls help children build the inference that I / you / she / he fall(s) the book is unacceptable.…”
Section: Entrenchment and Preemption In Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Langacker (1987) comments, “Every use of a structure has a positive impact on its degree of entrenchment” (p. 57). Entrenchment has been employed to explain L1 development (Blumenthal-Dramé, 2012), predicting that repeated use of a linguistic form in one structure minimizes the possibility that this form could be used in another structure (Braine & Brooks, 1995). For instance, repeated occurrences of fall in I / you fall and she / he falls help children build the inference that I / you / she / he fall(s) the book is unacceptable.…”
Section: Entrenchment and Preemption In Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And Schmid (2000: 39) proposes a "From-Corpus-to-Cognition Principle: frequency in text instantiates entrenchment in the cognitive system. " More recently, some have adopted a more critical and questioning stance on the relationship between corpus frequency and entrenchment (Schmid 2010, Blumenthal-Dramé 2012) and yet it is generally assumed that comprehension and production are similar and that for frequency of usage there is essentially a simple input-output model with a single conception of entrenchment covering both comprehension and production. From this perspective, comprehension and production are two sides of the same coin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation can be partly explained by the frequency of the adverb and (to a lesser extent) by its frequency relative to that of its base. The fact that simple token frequency comes out as the best predictor is somewhat surprising in light of the work by Hay (2001, 2003) and Blumenthal-Dormé (2012). This discrepancy may be due to our method, which focuses on high-frequency adverbs to begin with, or it may be due to the choice of case study, as ly -adverbs lean closer to the inflectional end of morphological complexity than the complex forms studied by Hay and Blumenthal-Dormé.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%