Entrepreneurial cognition and premature scaling of startups: a qualitative analysis of determinants of start-up failures

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the behavioral patterns of entrepreneurs, their cognitive styles and personality characteristics that can lead to a self-destructive chain of events during the transition from a fledgling business to one capable of long-term, profitable growth. This study adopts the self-regulation attitude theory to uncover the reasons for premature start-up scaling, which will help founders to study on their cognitive biases, emotions and behaviors and make efforts to do what does not come naturally to them. Design/methodology/approach The respondents for this qualitative study were selected from a group of entrepreneurs with extensive experience with technology start-ups that have either failed or succeeded during their development stages. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight participants, who were selected through snowball sampling, on the theme of understanding “How do premature scaling mistakes happen?”. Thematic analysis was used to unearth common themes. Findings The results of this study identified the following themes, “comparison,” “emotional over-reaction,” “impatience,” “mistaken customer priorities,” “overestimation” and “overconfidence,” which eventually leads to premature scaling. The underlying decision-making heuristics of entrepreneurs can be identified as engulfed in different cognitive biases and emotions resulting in negative behavioral patterns, as in the case of premature scaling. Of the six themes, “comparison,” “mistaken customer priorities,” “overestimation” and “overconfidence relates to cognitive bias” and “emotional over-reaction” and “impatience” relate to emotional factors. Research limitations/implications The study was made possible with the support of the voluntary participants chosen by purposive and snowballing data sampling. The interviewee and interviewer biases could have also crept in as part of this qualitative approach. The study pertains only to start-ups in the information technology sector and further studies need to be done to generalize the results across industries as well. Practical implications This early-stage underestimation of unexpected obstacles in the entrepreneurship journey necessitates a focus on the entrepreneur too, as much as the concept. In these hectic and fast-paced circumstances, aspiring entrepreneurs must be taught how to deal objectively with themselves and others, as well as think strategically. Leaders who scale do so because they take purposeful measures to overcome their weaknesses through self-discipline, soliciting advice from others and using their right to change their attitude and points of view. Originality/value The study frames the new approach into the entrepreneurial literature, linking it to self-regulation attitude theory and adds to the nascent literature on neuroentrepreneurship which discuss entrepreneurial cognition, decision-making, and entrepreneurial behavior. This study attempted to explore the reasons behind the premature scaling of startups on an individual level. This study is pioneering in exploring the cognitive factors underlying an entrepreneur’s decision that results in premature scaling. This study provides insights for academicians, entrepreneurs and policymakers and helps understand the cognitive journey that leads to premature scaling.

What Affects Startup Acquisition in Emerging Economy? Evidence from India

“…However, a cash crunch may be encountered in the expansionary stage. Further, behavioral factors such as entrepreneurial cognition can play a role in startup failure (Joseph et al, 2021). Behavioral biases could lead to premature scaling up.…”

Machine learning models for early‐stage investment decision making in startups

“…Organizational ecology studies underscore the significance of strategic choices and competitive positioning in determining mortality rates (Lourdes Sosa, 2012). Behavioral research also indicates biases and heuristics among founders that hamper objective decision making (Casti, 2021; Joseph et al, 2021; Onan, 2023b). Exogenous theories conversely examine external environmental forces precipitating failure.…”

Why do startups fail? A core competency deficit model

“…Empirical studies often examine one or a few predictors of startup failures, or they identify multiple factors without proposing a clear theoretical framework to systematize these underlying reasons ( Littunen et al, 1998 ; Lussier and Pfeifer, 2001 ; Rogoff et al, 2004 ; Cardon et al, 2011 ; Giardino et al, 2014 ; Khelil, 2016 ; Krishna et al, 2016 ; Bednár and Tarišková, 2017 ; Mikle, 2020 ; Santisteban et al, 2022 ; Joseph et al, 2023 ). For instance, Bednár and Tarišková (2017) list 13 different factors, including lack of money, cost issues, and lack of investors, among others.…”