Entrepreneurial cognition and socially situated approach: a systematic and bibliometric analysis

Sassetti, Sara; Marzi, Giacomo; Cavaliere, Vincenzo; Ciappei, Cristiano

doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2809-4

Cited by 46 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 199 publications

(259 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Entrepreneurship researchers perceive cognition as an agenda for understanding how some individuals identify and exploit opportunities to create something of value (Sadler-Smith 2004;Sassetti, et al 2018). Krueger (2000) points out that many authors have argued that there is a need to use cognition-based perspectives to describe and explain managerial and entrepreneurial behavior.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does decision-making style predict managers’ entrepreneurial intentions?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the way managers make decisions (their decision-making style-DMS) predicts their entrepreneurial intentions (EI), a research subject that has been largely ignored in the literature. Developing an understanding of entrepreneurial intention factors that attract managers to entrepreneurship is indispensable for organizations. A sample of 230 managers of companies based in Kosovo was asked to take the entrepreneurial intention questionnaire and the General Decision-Making Style (GDMS) questionnaire. Bridging two strands of literature on decision-making and entrepreneurial intention and using the Structural Equation Model (SEM), it is concluded that spontaneous and intuitive styles predict managers' entrepreneurial intentions. Considering the limitations of this single-country study, the implications for theory and policy are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does decision-making style predict managers’ entrepreneurial intentions?

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In order to offer a non-biased and fine-grained analysis of the literature concerning the topic of SME default prediction, we opted for a hybrid approach combining a quantitative bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review. This approach has already been adopted in other field of studies, such as sustainability (Mura et al 2018 ), innovation (Klarin 2019 ; Marzi et al 2021 ), knowledge management (Fakhar Manesh et al 2021 ; Pellegrini et al 2020 ), strategy (Ciampi et al 2020 ) and entrepreneurship (Delgado García et al 2015 ; Sassetti et al 2018 ), where it showed its effectiveness and reliability (Ding et al 2014 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The aforementioned operators perform research in titles, abstracts and keywords inside each document indexed in the database. We limited our query to “articles” and “literature reviews” (Delgado García et al 2015 ; Pellegrini et al 2020 ; Sassetti et al 2018 ) and excluded subject areas not pertinent to the scientific domain object of our research.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last dozen years, the topic of small and medium enterprise (SME) default prediction has developed into a relevant research domain that has grown for important reasons exponentially across multiple disciplines, including finance, management, accounting, and statistics. Motivated by the enormous toll on SMEs caused by the 2007–2009 global financial crisis as well as the recent COVID-19 crisis and the consequent need to develop new SME default predictors, this paper provides a systematic literature review, based on a statistical, bibliometric analysis, of over 100 peer-reviewed articles published on SME default prediction modelling over a 34-year period, 1986 to 2019. We identified, analysed and reviewed five streams of research and suggest a set of future research avenues to help scholars and practitioners address the new challenges and emerging issues in a changing economic environment. The research agenda proposes some new innovative approaches to capture and exploit new data sources using modern analytical techniques, like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and macro-data inputs, with the aim of providing enhanced predictive results.

show abstract

“…In this context, literature reviews represent a helpful kind of academic writing for summarizing extant knowledge, deliver policy suggestions, and supporting practice [27,33,40]. Literature reviews in social sciences can be undertaken for a variety of purposes, such as for classifying extant knowledge according to specific concepts [41] or understanding the relationship between two distinguished concepts [42]. Although all these instances share a common starting point that is the summary of the evidence, the multiplicity of purposes that they may have has implied the development of several methodologies and approaches to conduct them.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The economic, social, and environmental contingencies of the last two decades have called into question the need for public sector organizations to align accounting practices with sustainable concerns. Sustainability refers to the ability of organizations to co-create economic value in the long run, involving all stakeholders, safeguarding the environment, and generating well-being for the community. While this topic attracts increasing interests from several perspectives, there is a lack of a comprehensive assessment of how academia is debating it. Therefore, this paper reviews the field of sustainability, accounting, and reporting (SAR) in the public sector in order to develop insights into how the literature is developing the theme of public value (PV) co-creation, offer a critique of the state-of-the-art to date, and outline future research opportunities. The study is based on a structured literature review (SLR) methodology that enables studying the corpus of scholarly literature, developing insights, critical reflections, and future research paths. The results highlight that, although the involvement of stakeholders appears as crucial for developing SAR practices in the public sector, scholars have not yet adopted a PV co-creation perspective to this phenomenon, since, at best, previous studies only focused on the stakeholders’ involvement, without considering other aspects such as synergistic integration of resources and alignment of purposes. Therefore, academics should rethink their research setting and implications to provide a significant contribution by conducting studies capable of leading future development of SA in the public sector.

show abstract

Entrepreneurial cognition and socially situated approach: a systematic and bibliometric analysis

Cited by 46 publications

References 199 publications

Does decision-making style predict managers’ entrepreneurial intentions?

Does decision-making style predict managers’ entrepreneurial intentions?

Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives

Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About