Entrepreneurial marketing orientation of the Polish and Finnish SMEs and its environmental determinants

Abstract

Purpose The entrepreneurial marketing orientation (EMO) has been studied primarily in developed countries. The past research has focused on entrepreneurial marketing dimensions and their relationship with selected small- and medium-sized firm (SME) activities, strategic orientations or performance. Scholars have not paid enough attention to the EMO determinants. This study aims to investigate whether the SMEs originating from different countries, including the post-transition market, differ in their entrepreneurial marketing approach and checks its external determinants connected with environmental turbulence. Design/methodology/approach A total of 219 Polish and 81 Finnish manufacturing SMEs, serving mainly business-to-business clients, were surveyed using the mixed-mode computer assisted telephone interview/computer assisted web interview method between 2020 and 2021. Structural equation modelling, multigroup confirmatory factor analysis analysis, analysis of variance and T-tests were applied. Findings The metric and partial scalar invariance of the EMO scale used in Finland and Poland was found. The authors showed that Finnish firms represent a more robust entrepreneurial posture in marketing than Polish ones. The export market turbulence and the perceived crisis influence are the environmental determinants of EMO level, while the industry technological development level is not. Research limitations/implications The conducted analyses allowed to identify EMO determinants, verify the entrepreneurial marketing measurement concept in a new country (Finland) and show the differences in EMO between SMEs from a less and more developed country. Originality/value The existing literature lacks empirical data on the external EMO determinants and inter-country comparisons. This study shows the differences in EMO level of companies from different country backgrounds and points to the market turbulence as its determinant.

Globalization orientation, business practices and performance outcomes: an empirical investigation of B2B manufacturing firms

“…We divided the sample into two groups: European Union (EU) manufacturing companies ( n 1 = 231) and Non-European Union (Non-EU) manufacturing companies ( n 2 = 208). We followed Kowalik et al (2022) to test measurement invariance. In the first test (configural invariance), the model fit for the unconstrained combined sample of EU and Non-EU countries was excellent ( χ 2 = 686.006, DF = 506, χ 2 / DF = 1.357, CFI = 0.956, SRMR = 0.056, RMSEA = 0.029, PClose = 1.000).…”

The Entrepreneurship Marketing Practices: Evidence from Pakistan

“…Furthermore, they have established the conceptual framework of entrepreneurial marketing. Regarding the study's background, similar research studies have been conducted in Sri Lanka, Poland, and the UAE (Kowalik et al, 2022;Shanmugathas, 2021;. However, to the best of the author's knowledge, this topic is relatively unexplored in Pakistan, which will be beneficial for researchers and university students alike, as it can help them develop a clear understanding and identify new marketing opportunities with solid theoretical support.…”

“…The traditional 4Ps, which encompass product, price, place, and promotion, are explained as the foundation for planning long-term sustainability in a company's marketing strategies (Bennett, 1997). It assists marketers in effectively positioning their products (Kowalik et al, 2022). It is regarded as a conceptual framework within a scientific theory, supporting marketers in making decisions and utilizing it as a tool to achieve long-term tactical objectives for the success of their products in the market (Palmer, 2004;Waseem et al, 2023).…”

How much customer collaboration is too much? Implications for user entrepreneurship and product performance

“…Despite the important role of customers in the innovation process, scarce attention has been directed towards understanding the role of value co-creation in the B2B marketing literature (Massi et al , 2021). While research in the B2B marketing and entrepreneurship interface has increased in the recent years (Dziubaniuk and Ivanova-Gongne, 2021; Kowalik et al , 2022; Parry, 2020; Srivastava et al , 2022; Yang and Gabrielsson, 2017), there is limited work directed towards understanding the customer-based factors driving product performance. Taken together, the lack of research relating to the utility of value co-creation necessitates a better understanding of the value and the extent to which value co-creation influences product performance in the B2B context.…”