Entrepreneurial practices of collaboration comprising constellations

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore empirically and theoretically collaborations, which small entrepreneurial firms establish with other firms, stemming from innovation processes within the original firm.Design/methodology/approachThe article advances “entrepreneurship as practice” (EaP) using practice theory, employing specifically the concept of constellations. Three specific constellations emerge, each characterized by particular practices, purposes and outcomes. The empirical material stems from a collective case study of 32 entrepreneurial firms regarding 40 innovation projects.FindingsThe findings suggest that innovation practices in entrepreneurial firms stimulate new collaborations forming specific constellations, which in turn lead to learning and further innovation.Research limitations/implicationsThe theoretical framework developed extends EaP and practice theory by casting light on how constellations are, their forms, shapes and outcomes. The findings extend existing research on collaboration for innovation and contribute to practice theory by modeling different constellations and their structures.Practical implicationsThe practical implications of the findings for entrepreneurial firms arise from understandings of how different constellations may influence further learning and innovation.Originality/valueThe originality of the study is the identification and exposition of distinctive constellations of collaboration stemming from entrepreneurial innovation. This study exposes that innovation is differently open, whether the collaboration is interdependent, incorporated into the collaboration or independent from the other collaborative partners, with implications for learning and for innovation outcomes. The findings give insight into the enabling and limiting factors of each constellation, factors which may facilitate or hinder learning and innovation.

Entrepreneurial approach for open innovation: opening new opportunities, mapping knowledge and highlighting gaps

“…Future studies should analyse how organisations' characteristics, objectives and bargaining power may reflect upon the overall portfolio strategy (Pellegrini et al , 2019). Yet, the negotiation capability of the entrepreneur is also crucial to strike and manage advantageous deals, especially in the context of SMEs (Hydle and Billington, 2021).…”

The role of universities in scaling up informal entrepreneurship

“…However, informal sector enterprises face a number of common obstacles to innovation and upgrading with regard to infrastructure, finance, education and skills, and access to information, among others (Jeremy et al, 2016; Koto, 2015). This points to the need for institutional and policy interventions and collaboration to support their upscaling (Hira, 2013; Hydle and Billington, 2012; Quartey and Ogunteye, 2021) and possible internationalization (Coudounaris, 2021).…”

Social entrepreneurship organisations and collaboration: taking stock and looking forward

“…This creates an opportunity to apply practice theories and a process perspective, especially considering the growing prominence of more processual and practice-based understandings of entrepreneurship, or as Johannisson (2018) labels it, “social entrepreneuring”. The application of practice theories is also likely to provide deeper insights into microfoundations of SEO collaboration, micro-actions and interactions of social entrepreneurs and their partners (Hydle and Billington, 2021; Resch and Steyaert, 2020). This approach shifts the focus from structures and governance of collaborations to entrepreneurial “doings” for collaboration.…”