Entrepreneurship Education: Innovations and Best Practices

Manimala, Mathew J.; Thomas, Princy

doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3319-3_1

Cited by 18 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 99 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ Wilson et al, 2009] Initiators Public and private sectors, universities, etc. [Manimala, Thomas, 2017 [Semenova, Rudakova, 2015]. However, too low requirements for the level of knowledge students must acquire during the course can lead to a situation when those who have formally completed their studies do not actually possess the relevant competencies.…”

Section: Availability Of Programs and The Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In India and the US informal initiatives to develop entrepreneurial competences are often supported by NGOs. Priority is given to women, young people, and the unemployed, while coverage rates serve as performance criteria [Manimala, Thomas, 2017]. In Kazakhstan the state is the key initiator of open access entrepreneurship education projects [Bisengalieva, Smagulova, 2019].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Informal Entrepreneurship Education: Overview of the Russian Field

Sorokin¹,

Povalko²

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes the informal sector of entrepreneurial education — free “open” educational projects at the federal level in the context of broader trends in the development of education and society, including education’s ‘unbundling’. The search for information was carried out using the Internet, as a result 45 initiatives were discovered. The results show that the sector of entrepreneurship education is broad, but there are a large number of areas for improvement, in which universities can play an important role. In particular, this concerns elaborating and implementing a system for evaluating educational results, organizing monitoring of the effectiveness of such initiatives, including the analysis of success stories. In addition, a separate task is to expand the set of targeted programs for specific audiences (for example, unemployed), as well as to improve the content of such initiatives more deeply according to the specifics of the relevant target groups (for example, young mothers or older people).

show abstract

Section: Availability Of Programs and The Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Informal Entrepreneurship Education: Overview of the Russian Field

Sorokin¹,

Povalko²

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ Wilson et al, 2009] Initiators Public and private sectors, universities, etc. [Manimala, Thomas, 2017] Content focus of training Social, routine, innovation, technology entrepreneurship. The latter commands the highest attention in international literature, since it's expected to yield the highest returns.…”

Section: Availability Of Programs and The Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2021

Foresight and STI Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Foresight and STI Governance is an international interdisciplinary peer-reviewed openaccess journal. It publishes original research articles, offering new theoretical insights and practice-oriented knowledge in important areas of strategic planning and the creation of science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy, and it examines possible and alternative futures in all human endeavors in order to make such insights available to the right person at the right time to ensure the right decision.The journal acts as a scientific forum, contributing to the interaction between researchers, policy makers, and other actors involved in innovation processes. It encompasses all facets of STI policy and the creation of technological, managerial, product, and social innovations. Foresight and STI Governance welcomes works from scholars based in all parts of the world. Topics covered include:• Foresight methodologies and best practices;• Long-term socioeconomic priorities for strategic planning and policy making;• Innovative strategies at the national, regional, sectoral, and corporate levels;• The development of National Innovation Systems;• The exploration of the innovation lifecycle from idea to market;• Technological trends, breakthroughs, and grand challenges;• Technological change and its implications for economy, policy-making, and society;• Corporate innovation management;• Human capital in STI; and many others.The target audience of the journal comprises research scholars, university professors, postgraduates, policy-makers, business people, the expert community, and others who are interested in S&T and innovation analyses, foresight studies, and policy issues. The journal is included into the 1st quartile (Q1) of the Scopus

show abstract

“…Entrepreneurship education is one that teaches the knowledge, function, attitude, and value necessary to start and operate the business successfully. It is defined as a comprehensive concept of education needed to prepare for the actual future entrepreneurship and a process of cultivating entrepreneurship including management skills, attitude and value as a potential worker [4]. This means that entrepreneurship education is a process that provides not only preliminary founders but also potential workers with various learning to help them perform their work in the company.…”

Section: Concept Of Entrepreneurship Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of the Quality of Entrepreneurship Education and Students' Participation on Entrepreneurial Competence and Entrepreneurial Intention

Lim¹

2021

APJCRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate whether the entrepreneurship education conducted by universities affects university students' competence and their entrepreneurial intention. The empirical study was conducted to verify the structural relationship between the quality of entrepreneurship education and students' willingness to participate, entrepreneurial competence and entrepreneurial intention. For this purpose, a survey was conducted on 360 university students in Busan, Ulsan and Gyeongnam Province who experienced entrepreneurship education. The survey took place in parallel with face-to-face and online surveys from early January to late May 2020. The frequency analysis was conducted using SPSS to analyze the status of the data collected through the survey. In addition, reliability analysis and exploratory factor analysis were performed to verify the reliability and validity of the measurement tool, and confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and structural equation model analysis were conducted to verify the research hypothesis of this study using AMOS. The empirical study was conducted to verify the structural relationship between the quality of entrepreneurship education and students' willingness to participate, entrepreneurial competence and entrepreneurial intention. The results are summarized as follows. First, the quality of entrepreneurship education of universities had a significant positive effect on students' participation in entrepreneurship education. Second, the quality of entrepreneurship education had a significant positive effect on entrepreneurship competence. Third, participation in entrepreneurship education had a significant positive effect on entrepreneurship competence. Fourth, the participation in entrepreneurship education had a significant positive effect on the entrepreneurial intention. Fifth, the entrepreneurial competence had a significant positive effect on entrepreneurial intention. However, the quality of entrepreneurship education did not have a direct and significant effect on the entrepreneurial intention, which showed a contrast. In conclusion, based on the results, the university needs to improve the quality of practical entrepreneurship education and to encourage students to participate actively in entrepreneurship education in order to strengthen their entrepreneurship competence.

show abstract

Entrepreneurship Education: Innovations and Best Practices

Cited by 18 publications

References 99 publications

Informal Entrepreneurship Education: Overview of the Russian Field

Informal Entrepreneurship Education: Overview of the Russian Field

Untitled

The Effect of the Quality of Entrepreneurship Education and Students' Participation on Entrepreneurial Competence and Entrepreneurial Intention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About