2009
DOI: 10.1504/ijesb.2009.023020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrepreneurship in emerging high-tech industries: ICT entrepreneurs between experts and kamikazes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study corroborates the extant literature (e.g., Baldry, et al, 2007;Robert, et al, 2009) by finding evidence that new entrants to the IT sector are likely to spend periods of their careers as self-employed. Evidence of acknowledgement of the implications of this, particularly in terms of the need to develop skills and strategies for operating as selfemployed in the IT environment, seems to be largely absent though.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The study corroborates the extant literature (e.g., Baldry, et al, 2007;Robert, et al, 2009) by finding evidence that new entrants to the IT sector are likely to spend periods of their careers as self-employed. Evidence of acknowledgement of the implications of this, particularly in terms of the need to develop skills and strategies for operating as selfemployed in the IT environment, seems to be largely absent though.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Zahra et al (2009) studied the social entrepreneur (‘social bricoleur’, ‘social constructionist’ and ‘social engineer’) through motives, organisational structure and strategy. Robert et al (2009) presented findings similar to those of Korunka et al (2003), and identified four types of high-tech, micro-firm entrepreneurs (unprepared, risk-taking ‘kamikazes’, inexperienced ‘freshmen’, cadres with industry experience, and careful preparers). Integrating motivation, risk taking and self-identity, Mills and Pawson (2012) analysed the narratives of nascent entrepreneurs and presented evidence of the alignment of self-identity and strategic behaviour (‘creative person’, ‘hero’, ‘adventurer’ and ‘cautious traveller’).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For example, training, education, past career and personal characteristics may lead success owner-managers to behave as ‘innovators’ (Miles and Snow, 1978; Weber, 1988), ‘managers’ (Laufer, 1975) or ‘prospectors’ (Miles and Snow, 1978). This growth-seeking profile appears to have been the most widely studied in entrepreneurship research, and has been variously termed ‘growth-autonomy-perpetuation’ (Marchesnay, 1992); ‘enterprising owner’, ‘VIP’ and ‘nomad’ (Marchesnay, 1998); ‘innovator’ (Weber, 1988); ‘manager’ and ‘technician’ (Laufer, 1975); and ‘experienced cadre’ (Robert et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have been considered only unidirectional influencing factors that led to an increasing number of entrepreneurs' typologies or taxonomies [12], [13] which were strongly criticized because they were inappropriate to grasp entirely such a complex and multidimensional phenomenon [14]. Moreover, this set of heterogeneous entrepreneur's typologies and taxonomies led to the multiplication of contradictory results, classification or prescriptions which are impossible to compare [15] and casting doubt on the existence of homogeneous entrepreneurs' profiles.…”
Section: Enhancing the Matching Potential Of Re To Increase Cbm Efficmentioning
confidence: 99%