Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal

Abstract

This paper investigates whether a high level of new business formation in a region stimulates employment growth in that region. We look at the lag structure of these effects using a data set covering a fairly large time span . We find that indirect effects of new firm births on subsequent employment growth are stronger than direct effects. However, indirect effects only occur about eight years after new firm formation. In particular, and unlike the findings from studies of other countries using a similar approach, positive indirect effects do not seem to tail off in the Portuguese case. This is likely due to a general pattern of results in which lags appear to be longer for Portugal. In view of these results, we suggest that the lag times and magnitudes the effects on new firm formation on subsequent employment growth are likely dependent on the types and qualities of start-ups.Acknowledgements: the authors would like to thank

Entrepreneurial education and internationalisation of firms in transition economies: a conceptual framework from the case of Croatia

“…Furthermore, internationalisation can also have other beneficial effects in the original home economy as spill overs in the local system boost a general increase in regional development (Laukkanen, 2000;Baptista et al, 2008). This paper is intended as an exploratory investigation of the matter, and no quantitative analysis has been realised.…”

“…Traditionally related with the creation and growth of economic activities (Davidsson, 1991;Lee et al, 2004;Wright and Stigliani, 2013), entrepreneurship has been studied with multiple facets over the past years. It has been identified as one of the main elements of economic growth and GDP increases (Wong et al, 2005); as a factor fostering the economical sustainability of developing countries (Ahmed and Mcquay;; as a factor influencing regional development through jobs creation (Venkataraman, 2004;Fayolle, 2007;Baptista et al, 2008); as one of individual responses to unemployment (Caputo, Lombardi et al, 2016;Gohmann, 2012;Hoxha, 2008;Tipu, 2012) in times of economic recession (Fairlie, 2013); as a driver of innovation and new product creation (Audretsch and Link, 2012;Drucker, 2014;Joshi, 2010); as a means of female and youth empowerment in developing contexts Ramadani et al, 2015). Thus, successful entrepreneurship has historically been addressed as a social phenomenon characterised as a social function for the development of communities (Wilton and Toh, 2012).…”

The Lebanese Perception of the Impact of Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) on the National Economy

“…The SME sector has stayed very innovative and adaptable in order to survive the recent economic downturn and recession. Empirical studies show that new firms play a significant role in employment generation (e.g., Garikai, 2011;Baptista et al, 2005;Stel & Suddle, 2005), innovation (e.g., Fritsch & Mueller, 2005), economic growth and reduction of unemployment (Garikai, 2011).…”

Entrepreneurial activity and regional development

“…After this discovery the interest for studying the effects of entrepreneurship on job creation started to grow sharply. Many subsequent studies (Acs & Armington, 2003;Audretsch & Thurik, 2000;Audretsch & Fritsch, 2002;Baptista, Escária, & Madruga, 2007;Mueller, Van Stel, & Storey, 2008;Reynolds, 1999;Thurik, 2003) show that starting new companies potentiates the creation of new jobs and regional growth, even after accounting for the eventual company closures. Acs and Armington (2003) studied the factors that influence economic growth on a sample of 394 US regions.…”