2017
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.86.095001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropic Approach to Error-Disturbance Tradeoff in Quantum Measurements

Abstract: We discuss the relation between entropic uncertainty relations by Buscemi et al. and by Barchielli et al.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurement uncertainty relations (MURs) for joint measurements quantify to which extent one can approximate a set of measurements of incompatible observables by means of a single joint measurement [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. On the other side, MURs of noise/disturbance type quantify the total uncertainty generated by an approximate measurement of a first observable disturbing the measurement of a second one [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Finally, one speaks of preparation uncertainty relations (PURs) when some lower bound is given on the 'spreads' of the distributions of some observables measured in the same state [8][9][10][11][12][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement uncertainty relations (MURs) for joint measurements quantify to which extent one can approximate a set of measurements of incompatible observables by means of a single joint measurement [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. On the other side, MURs of noise/disturbance type quantify the total uncertainty generated by an approximate measurement of a first observable disturbing the measurement of a second one [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Finally, one speaks of preparation uncertainty relations (PURs) when some lower bound is given on the 'spreads' of the distributions of some observables measured in the same state [8][9][10][11][12][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%