2019
DOI: 10.3390/e21020178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropic Approach to the Detection of Crucial Events

Abstract: In this paper, we establish a clear distinction between two processes yielding anomalous diffusion and 1 / f noise. The first process is called Stationary Fractional Brownian Motion (SFBM) and is characterized by the use of stationary correlation functions. The second process rests on the action of crucial events generating ergodicity breakdown and aging effects. We refer to the latter as Aging Fractional Brownian Motion (AFBM). To settle the confusion between these different forms of Fractional Browni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent research suggests there may be different types of LRTC at play in these various systems and not distinguishing them carefully may be leading to false conclusions about criticality. For example, the discovery of crucial events in the area of turbulence led to the identification of "crucial event LRTC" or CELRTC (Bohara et al, 2018;Culbreth et al, 2019). CELRTC emerges in critical systems, specifically self-organized temporal criticality (SOTC) and is based on a slowly-decaying, nonstationary correlation function (Mahmoodi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent research suggests there may be different types of LRTC at play in these various systems and not distinguishing them carefully may be leading to false conclusions about criticality. For example, the discovery of crucial events in the area of turbulence led to the identification of "crucial event LRTC" or CELRTC (Bohara et al, 2018;Culbreth et al, 2019). CELRTC emerges in critical systems, specifically self-organized temporal criticality (SOTC) and is based on a slowly-decaying, nonstationary correlation function (Mahmoodi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a statistical analysis of time series generated by criticality-induced intelligence, based on a method recently proposed to detect crucial events by Culbreth et al (20) to find the criticality point in the complex network dynamical models. This method is based on converting empirical time-series data into a diffusion process from which the probability density function (SI Appendix) is calculated and the entropy determined.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When criticality-induced intelligence (collective intelligence) becomes active, the driven process is expected to depart from ordinary diffusion signified by having a scaling index different from δ = 0.5. The modified DEA (MDEA) illustrated in Culbreth et al ( 20 ) filters out the scaling behavior of infinite stationary memory, when it exists ( 21 ), and the remaining deviation of the scaling index from δ = 0.5 is solely due to crucial events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use the DEA of Ref. [37] which adopts the method of stripes to fully benefit from the connection between crucial events and diffusion established by Ref. [36].…”
Section: B Diffusion Entropy With Stripesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After establishing the connection between scaling and walking rule, it is easy to explain to the readers the convenience of adopting DEA with stripes, as done in Ref. [37]. We use the experimental time series ξ(t), n(t) in the case of this paper, to define events either crucial or not crucial as follows.…”
Section: B Diffusion Entropy With Stripesmentioning
confidence: 99%