The Entropic Associative Memory is a novel computational model of memory that uses a standard array or table as its medium. The system defines three memory operations in relation to a cue, which are called λ-register, η-recognition and β-retrieval. The memory is declarative, abstractive, distributed, productive, constructive and cues not included in the memory are rejected directly without search. λ-register and η-recognition are cell-to-cell operations, and β-retrieval is a column-to-column operation, and the three operations can be performed in parallel. The content of the memory is indeterminate and has an entropy. The β-retrieval operation renders determinate objects on the basis of complete and incomplete cues and the indeterminate memory content. The distributive and indeterminate character of the memory makes the stored objects opaque for direct inspection on the memory medium, and yet they can be made readily available when the memory is queried with an appropriate cue. The indeterminacy also allows that a very large amount of objects can be stored and retrieved effectively with very limited computing resources. In our previous work we explored the auto-associative properties of the memory and performed experiments to store, recognize and retrieve manuscript digits and letters with complete and incomplete cues, and also to recognize and learn phones, with satisfactory results. In such experiments a designated memory register was used to store all the objects of the same class, whereas in the present study we remove such restriction and use a single memory register to store all the objects in the domain. In this novel setting we explore the production of emerging objects and relations, such that cues are used not only to retrieve remembered objects, but also related and imaged objects, and to produce associations chains. The present model supports the view that memory and classification are independent functions both conceptually and architecturally. The memory system can store images of the different modalities of perception and action, possible multimodal, and offers a novel perspective on the imagery debate and computational models of declarative memory.