Entropy and Eye Movement: A Micro-analysis of Information Processing in Activity Units During the Translation Process

Wei, Yuxiang

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69777-8_7

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Under the interactive background among modern information technologies, neuroscience, and psychology, TS embraces the empirical, interdisciplinary, and comprehensive features of these disciplines, reflected in constantly creative methodologies and paradigms, such as corpus-based studies [10], eye-movement studies [11], keylogging studies [12], and screen-recorded studies [13].…”

Section: Cognitive Turnmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Paradigmatic Turn in Recent Translation Reception Study: Toward an Empirical Trend

Sun¹

2023

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In translation reception study, a rudimentary sub-field in Translation Studies (TS) with controversial accounts and views, several paradigmatic turns have brought about refreshing insights and promoted the heated issues to move beyond extant disciplinary boundaries and restrictions. This paper first presents a brief overview of how the recent decades have witnessed a proliferation of paradigmatic turns in TS in terms of cultural, sociological, technical, economic, and cognitive thought and practice. By mapping translation reception study into a digital-driven setting, I attempt to expound the changes, reforms, and fashions in current research scope and academic foci, and contribute to a viable outlook on prospective research regarding theoretical models, readership, and diachrony. Toward an empirical trend, plausible exploratory and explanatory solutions are likely to unravel the secret of how global translation products circulate and how they are received by target audiences, readers, or users.

show abstract

Section: Cognitive Turnmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Paradigmatic Turn in Recent Translation Reception Study: Toward an Empirical Trend

Sun¹

2023

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Monitor Model and its misconceptions

Carl

2023

American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Horizontal (automatic) and vertical (control) processes have been observed and reported for a long time in translation production. Schaeffer and Carl’s Monitor Model integrates these two processes into one framework, assuming that priming mechanisms underlie horizontal/automatic processes, while vertical/monitoring processes implement consciously accessible control mechanisms. The Monitor Model has been criticized in various ways and several misconceptions have accumulated over the past years. In this chapter, I update the Monitor Model with additional evidence and argue that it is compatible with an enactivist approach to cognition. I address several misconceptions related to the Monitor Model.

show abstract

Entropy and Eye Movement: A Micro-analysis of Information Processing in Activity Units During the Translation Process

Cited by 2 publications

References 36 publications

A Paradigmatic Turn in Recent Translation Reception Study: Toward an Empirical Trend

A Paradigmatic Turn in Recent Translation Reception Study: Toward an Empirical Trend

The Monitor Model and its misconceptions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About