2021
DOI: 10.3390/e24010011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy and Turbulence Structure

Abstract: Some new perspectives are offered on the spectral and spatial structure of turbulent flows, in the context of conservation principles and entropy. In recent works, we have shown that the turbulence energy spectra are derivable from the maximum entropy principle, with good agreement with experimental data across the entire wavenumber range. Dissipation can also be attributed to the Reynolds number effect in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Within the global energy and dissipation constraints, the gradients (d/dy+ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 presents model results for the temperature for similar conditions as Figure 5. The agreement appears to be less good due to scale resolution, but the temperature range for both data and simulation is constrained within (13,16) An objective evaluation of the model skill predictivity relative to data can be achieved through the target diagrams for salinity (Figure 7a-d) and temperature (Figure 8a-d The diagrams for the salinity confirm that the model prediction for St1, St5, and St6, can be considered satisfactory. Indeed, the dots in Figure 7a-d, for, respectively, St1, St2, St5, and St6, are situated very close to the axis origins, corresponding to low values of the bias: the absolute values of the bias are of the order or smaller than 5 PSU, which indicates a small deviation of the simulations relative to the data.…”
Section: The K-ε/sma Setupmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 6 presents model results for the temperature for similar conditions as Figure 5. The agreement appears to be less good due to scale resolution, but the temperature range for both data and simulation is constrained within (13,16) An objective evaluation of the model skill predictivity relative to data can be achieved through the target diagrams for salinity (Figure 7a-d) and temperature (Figure 8a-d The diagrams for the salinity confirm that the model prediction for St1, St5, and St6, can be considered satisfactory. Indeed, the dots in Figure 7a-d, for, respectively, St1, St2, St5, and St6, are situated very close to the axis origins, corresponding to low values of the bias: the absolute values of the bias are of the order or smaller than 5 PSU, which indicates a small deviation of the simulations relative to the data.…”
Section: The K-ε/sma Setupmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Typical summer salinity values, as in June 2001, were in the range of (30-34) PSU (which are values close to the ocean salinity), whereas low values (<5 PSU) were found close to the major river boundaries (stations 3, and 4) or at the far end areas (stations 6, 7 and 8) (30-33) PSU. The water temperature was in the range of (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) • C for spring and (18-24) • C for summer, typical values for those seasons. The model used in this work is the baseline Mike3-HD [50,61], which is based on the numerical solution of the two/three-dimensional incompressible Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, subject to the assumptions of Boussinesq and of hydrostatic pressure and consists in a system of continuity, momentum, temperature, and salinity equations.…”
Section: The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations