2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3156318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entry Games Under Private Information

Abstract: We study market entry decisions when firms have private information about their profitability. We generalize current models by allowing general forms of market competition and heterogeneous firms that self-select when entering the market. Post-entry profits depend on market structure, and on the identities and the private information of the entering firms. We introduce a notion of the firm's strength and show that an equilibrium where players' strategies are ranked by strength, or herculean equilibrium, always… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem has been addressed in the empirical industrial organization literature (Bresnahan and Reiss, 1990; Berry, 1992; Scott Morton, 1999; Berry and Reiss, 2007), and some solutions have been proposed in the theoretical literature. Espin‐Sanchez and Parra (2018) provide equilibrium selection by adding private information (see footnote ), and Quint and Einav (2005) propose a war of attrition in the entry game that has a unique equilibrium outcome. Generally, payoffs in an entry game are the market equilibrium payoff minus the entry cost if entering and zero otherwise; thus, if firms differ only in the entry cost, then such a game fits the setting described at the end of the previous paragraph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been addressed in the empirical industrial organization literature (Bresnahan and Reiss, 1990; Berry, 1992; Scott Morton, 1999; Berry and Reiss, 2007), and some solutions have been proposed in the theoretical literature. Espin‐Sanchez and Parra (2018) provide equilibrium selection by adding private information (see footnote ), and Quint and Einav (2005) propose a war of attrition in the entry game that has a unique equilibrium outcome. Generally, payoffs in an entry game are the market equilibrium payoff minus the entry cost if entering and zero otherwise; thus, if firms differ only in the entry cost, then such a game fits the setting described at the end of the previous paragraph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%