2012
DOI: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entry into primary care-based buprenorphine treatment is associated with identification and treatment of other chronic medical problems

Abstract: BackgroundBuprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid dependence that can be provided in a primary care setting. Offering this treatment may also facilitate the identification and treatment of other chronic medical conditions.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 168 patients who presented to a primary care clinic for treatment of opioid dependence and who received a prescription for sublingual buprenorphine within a month of their initial visit.ResultsOf the 168 new patients, 122 (7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If improving access to BMT also resulted in diversion to opioid naïve polysubstance users, there could be an overall negative public health impact; however, if concern about diversion resulted in stricter regulations, access to treatment could suffer, widening the treatment gap, and making it more difficult for marginalized PWUD to initiate BMT (Clark & Baxter, 2013). Additional data are necessary to estimate the prevalence of buprenorphine abuse; however, encouraging illicit buprenorphine users to initiate BMT instead of self-treating their addiction has clear advantages, such as education about risks, monitoring for other substance use, and treatment of co-morbid chronic conditions (Rowe, Jacapraro, & Rastegar, 2012; Schuman-Olivier et al, 2013). This requires access though, and even in a setting like New York City with numerous opioid treatment programs, capacity for treatment is only half of what is needed (McNeely et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If improving access to BMT also resulted in diversion to opioid naïve polysubstance users, there could be an overall negative public health impact; however, if concern about diversion resulted in stricter regulations, access to treatment could suffer, widening the treatment gap, and making it more difficult for marginalized PWUD to initiate BMT (Clark & Baxter, 2013). Additional data are necessary to estimate the prevalence of buprenorphine abuse; however, encouraging illicit buprenorphine users to initiate BMT instead of self-treating their addiction has clear advantages, such as education about risks, monitoring for other substance use, and treatment of co-morbid chronic conditions (Rowe, Jacapraro, & Rastegar, 2012; Schuman-Olivier et al, 2013). This requires access though, and even in a setting like New York City with numerous opioid treatment programs, capacity for treatment is only half of what is needed (McNeely et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2003). Among PC patients treated for opioid dependence, 74% reported at least one established CMC initially, and at least one newly identified CMC was subsequently found in 28% of patients (Rowe et al . 2012).…”
Section: Substances and Cmcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing these factors can facilitate targeted interventions that increase access to care and treatment initiation. Although several studies have examined patient-level predictors of treatment initiation in SUD specialty care settings, we are only aware of one study that has examined SUD treatment initiation in a primary care setting, finding that entry into a primary care-based buprenorphine treatment program was associated with identification of other chronic medical conditions (Rowe, Jacapraro, & Rastegar, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%