Entwicklung und Erprobung von Qualitätsindikatoren für die ambulante Pflege in der Schweiz

Burla, Laila; Schaffert, René; Mylaeus, Maja; Rüesch, Peter

doi:10.1055/s-0029-1233474

Cited by 7 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After removal of duplicates and title/abstract screening, 21 studies were potentially relevant. Four studies met the selection criteria after full-text screening [29,30,37,38]. Reference tracking of the eligible studies identified no additional article.…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Description of studies Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the selected papers. Three studies specified the development and validation process of separate RAI-HC QI sets, namely, interRAI's 1st generation QI set developed by Hirdes et al [37], the Swiss RAI-HC QI set developed by Burla et al [29], and interRAI's 2nd generation QI set developed by Morris et al [30]. One study by Dalby et al [38] explored the effects of risk adjustment for interRAI's 1st generation QI set.…”

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, we searched for grey literature on websites of relevant organizations (e.g. www.interrai.org) and contacted the study authors of two included articles, namely Burla et al [29] and Morris et al [30], to obtain additional information on the QIs definitions used in their study.…”

Section: Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The development and validation process of the Swiss RAI-HC QI set was described by Burla et al [29]. Based on interRAI's 1st generation QI set and by creating new QIs for the Swiss context with support of various experts, 29 candidate QIs were chosen.…”

Section: The Swiss Rai-hc Quality Indicator Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review

Wagner

Schaffert

Möckli

et al. 2020

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: One way of measuring the quality of home care are quality indicators (QIs) derived from data collected with the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC). In order to produce meaningful results for quality improvement and quality comparisons across home care organizations (HCOs) and over time, RAI-HC QIs must be valid and reliable. The aim of this systematic review was to identify currently existing RAI-HC QIs and to summarize the scientific knowledge on the validity and reliability of these QIs. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library. Studies describing the development process or the psychometric characteristics of RAI-HC QIs were eligible. The data extraction involved a general description of the included studies as well as the identified RAI-HC QIs and information on validity and reliability. The methodological quality of the identified RAI-HC QI sets was assessed using the Appraisal of Indicators through Research and Evaluation (AIRE) instrument. Results: Four studies out of 659 initial hits met the inclusion criteria. The included studies described the development and validation process of three RAI-HC QI sets comprising 48 unique RAI-HC QIs, which predominantly refer to outcome of care. Overall, the validity and reliability of the identified RAI-HC QIs were not sufficiently tested. The methodological quality of the three identified RAI-HC QI sets varied across the four AIRE instrument domains. None of the QI sets reached high methodological quality, defined as scores of 50% and higher in all four AIRE instrument domains. Conclusions: This is the first review that systematically summarized and appraised the available scientific evidence on the validity and reliability of RAI-HC QIs. It identified insufficient reporting of RAI-HC QIs validation processes and reliability as well as missing state-of-the-art methodologies. The review provides guidance as to what additional validity and reliability testing are needed to strengthen the scientific soundness of RAI-HC QIs. Considering that RAI-HC QIs are already implemented and used to measure and compare quality of home care, further investigations on RAI-HC QIs reliability and validity is recommended.

show abstract

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Search Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Swiss Rai-hc Quality Indicator Setmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review

Wagner

Schaffert

Möckli

et al. 2020

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…144,145 Specific tools evaluated included the Resident Assessment Instrument -Homecare. [146][147][148][149][150] Other tools evaluated were the Support Needs Assessment, the Five-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test, the Care Dependency Scale, and the Palliative Prognostic Index. 146,[151][152][153] What is the scope of technology and the future direction of homecare delivery?…”

Section: Treatment-related (Five Studies)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Homecare user needs from the perspective of the patient and carers: a review

Keeling¹

2014

SHTT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a global shift towards a blending of care delivery within formal and informal environments in direct response to economic and demographic pressures. Homecare is at the hub of this activity, enabling people to age in place and keeping families intact. However, our understanding of patient and carer needs is fragmented; understandably so, given the complexity of these needs. This descriptive review offers a content analysis of papers focused on patients' and carers' needs and homecare published between January 2010 and October 2013. It is evident that homecare is an intensely researched area, yet it is disjointed. Emerging research emphasizes the need to take a holistic approach. Firstly, incorporating emotional psychosocial and cultural elements will help to draw together our current understanding within a more cohesive framework. Secondly, tensions that hinder communication and collaboration between stakeholders must be resolved. Thirdly, information and communications technology is rapidly becoming synonymous with homecare, and offers solutions for facilitating care delivery, collaboration, and training of future professionals. The rate of international activity promises much for future research collaborations to compare, contrast, and identify best practices for the future of homecare as we endeavor to meet the ever-increasing pressures on health and social care systems.

show abstract

Dekubitus in deutschen Pflegeheimen

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Entwicklung und Erprobung von Qualitätsindikatoren für die ambulante Pflege in der Schweiz

Abstract: The Swiss version of RAI-HC provides a viable instrument for measuring quality of home care. The application of consistent assessment rules should be improved.

Cited by 7 publications

References 8 publications

Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review

Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review

Homecare user needs from the perspective of the patient and carers: a review

Dekubitus in deutschen Pflegeheimen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About