2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004119000252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enumerating coloured partitions in 2 and 3 dimensions

Abstract: We study generating functions of ordinary and plane partitions coloured by the action of a finite subgroup of the corresponding special linear group. After reviewing known results for the case of ordinary partitions, we formulate a conjecture concerning a factorisation property of the generating function of coloured plane partitions that can be thought of as an orbifold analogue of a conjecture of Maulik et al., now a theorem, in three-dimensional Donaldson-Thomas theory. We study natural quantisations of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can simply multiply (−1) n 0 +n 1 for the terms q n 0 0 q n 1 1 in Z c to recover 10 the correct signs in Z crystal . Alternatively, one may consider the twisted PE introduced in [60]. We find that in general given Z c = PE[g], the twisted PE of g is precisely Z crystal .…”
Section: Jhep06(2022)016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can simply multiply (−1) n 0 +n 1 for the terms q n 0 0 q n 1 1 in Z c to recover 10 the correct signs in Z crystal . Alternatively, one may consider the twisted PE introduced in [60]. We find that in general given Z c = PE[g], the twisted PE of g is precisely Z crystal .…”
Section: Jhep06(2022)016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the cohomological DT theory of the Jacobi algebras in (1.12) turns out to be the same. The cohomological BPS invariants for the noncommutative conifold can be deduced from [30] and purity (proved as in [12,Thm.4.7]):…”
Section: 11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also remark that in Corollary 1 there are 7 cases, while there are only 5 in Theorem 1. This is because part (5) in Theorem 1 encompasses cases ( 5) and (7) in Corollary 1, and part (4) in Theorem 1 encompasses cases ( 4) and (6) in Corollary 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%