2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2004.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enumeration of solid 2-trees according to edge number and edge degree distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formula (14 ) conforms to (1) as well. This time, however, both patterns are considered with respect to the number of polygonal blocks n, which differs (for m > 2) from the number of edges N. Formulae (14 ) and (15 ) for m = 3 also counts so-called 2-trees (resp., rooted and unrooted) with n triangles [5].…”
Section: Plane Trees Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formula (14 ) conforms to (1) as well. This time, however, both patterns are considered with respect to the number of polygonal blocks n, which differs (for m > 2) from the number of edges N. Formulae (14 ) and (15 ) for m = 3 also counts so-called 2-trees (resp., rooted and unrooted) with n triangles [5].…”
Section: Plane Trees Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appeared in [5] and [3] as an important tool in combinatorial enumeration. Suppose that a group A acts naturally (see [2, p. 393]) on a species F .…”
Section: Introduction To Species and Group Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quotient species (see [2, p. 159]) is defined based on group actions. It appeared in [5] and [3] as an important tool in combinatorial enumeration. Suppose that a group A acts naturally (see [2, p. 393]) on a species F .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harary and Palmer [12] counted unlabeled 2-trees in 1968 (see also Harary and Palmer [13, section 3.5]) and unlabeled 2-trees were counted in a different way, using the theory of combinatorial species, by Fowler et al in [10]. Many variations of 2-trees have also been counted [4,8,12,14,15,16].…”
Section: Figure 1 a 2-treementioning
confidence: 99%