2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03684-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enviromics in breeding: applications and perspectives on envirotypic-assisted selection

Abstract: We propose the application of Enviromics to breeding practice, by which the similarity among sites assessed on an "omics" scale of environmental attributes drives the prediction of unobserved genotypes.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neyhart et al (2021) assessed the genome-wide predictions in the unobserved environments for both between and within breeding generations. Resende et al (2020) recently proposed the geospatial (geographic information system) genotype-environment interaction (GIS-GEI) method within an enviromics framework. This framework involves the joint analysis of MET data accounting for phenotypic, genotypic and envirotypic sources of information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neyhart et al (2021) assessed the genome-wide predictions in the unobserved environments for both between and within breeding generations. Resende et al (2020) recently proposed the geospatial (geographic information system) genotype-environment interaction (GIS-GEI) method within an enviromics framework. This framework involves the joint analysis of MET data accounting for phenotypic, genotypic and envirotypic sources of information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A so far unexplored yet promising alternative would be to calibrate Genomic Prediction ( Crossa et al, 2017 ; Grattapaglia et al, 2018 ) and Machine Learning ( Gianola et al, 2011 ; Libbrecht and Noble, 2015 ; Schrider and Kern, 2018 ) models using high-throughput genotyping ( Cortés et al, 2020b ) of phenotyped ungrafted avocado trees spanning all three races, to predict rootstocks’ own unobserved phenotypes. Interpolating these predictions and quantitative genetic parameters across the rich ecological continuum of the northern Andean mountains ( Madriñán et al, 2013 ; Valencia et al, 2020 ), within a multi-climate ( Costa-Neto et al, 2020 ) “enviromic prediction” paradigm ( Resende et al, 2020 ), will be key to target optimum genotype x environment arrangements for yield ( Galeano et al, 2012 ; Blair et al, 2013 ) and quality ( Wu et al, 2020 ) components, as well as in the face of abiotic ( Cortés et al, 2020a ) and biotic ( Naidoo et al, 2019 ) stresses imposed by climate change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIGURE 1 | Trans-disciplinary approaches (arrows) such as predictive breeding (GP) and machine learning (ML) promise supporting genome-wide marker-assisted (MAS) pre-breeding and breeding strategies for the selection of (A) "plus trees" in the wild, key (B) intra-and (C) inter-specific parental combinations, and (D) elite offspring from those parents. GP and ML should go beyond breeding and feedback (E) germplasm utilization and environmental niche classification (Cortés et al, 2013) and enviromics (Costa-Neto et al, 2020;Resende et al, 2020). Genomic-assisted characterizations, such as Genome-Wide Association Studies-GWAS (Neale and Savolainen, 2004), Genome-Environment Associations-GEA (Rellstab et al, 2015;Cortés and Blair, 2018;López-Hernández and Cortés, 2019) and Genome-Wide Selection Scans-GWSS (Zahn and Purnell, 2016), must also start considering more thoroughly (F) novel sources of local adaptation, (G) genetic-guided infusions and assisted gene flow (AGF), as well an overall systems genetics thinking (Ingvarsson et al, 2016;Myburg et al, 2019).…”
Section: Predictive Breeding Promises Boosting Forest Tree Genetic Immentioning
confidence: 99%