2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2016.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment and initial state engineered dynamics of quantum and classical correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The range of variation of the mixing parameter p is now − 1 3 ≤ p ≤ 1, which guarantees the positivity of the GWLs. The parameter p, considered in the expression (6), is understood as a probability when the range of variation is 0 ≤ p ≤ 1. In this case the GWLs represents a convex sum of the density matrix of the GBps |ψ and non-coherent density matrix of an unpolarized state (white noise), with probabilities p and 1 − p, respectively.…”
Section: Generalized Werner-like Non-x Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3 The range of variation of the mixing parameter p is now − 1 3 ≤ p ≤ 1, which guarantees the positivity of the GWLs. The parameter p, considered in the expression (6), is understood as a probability when the range of variation is 0 ≤ p ≤ 1. In this case the GWLs represents a convex sum of the density matrix of the GBps |ψ and non-coherent density matrix of an unpolarized state (white noise), with probabilities p and 1 − p, respectively.…”
Section: Generalized Werner-like Non-x Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) are used to built the projector Pψ in the expression (6). One difference between the states (4) and ( 6) is that the Ws are X states while that the GWLs are not-X states in general, unless z 1 = z 4 = 0 or z 2 = z 3 = 0; like the WPs, QWs and BWLs.…”
Section: Generalized Werner-like Non-x Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations