We compare the adsorption dynamics of N 2 on the unstrained Fe(110) and on a 10% expanded Fe monolayer grown on W(110) by performing classical molecular dynamics simulations that use potential energy surfaces calculated with density functional theory. Our results allow us to understand why, experimentally, the molecular adsorption of N 2 is observed on the strained layer but not on Fe(110). Surprisingly, we also find that while surface strain favors the molecular adsorption of N 2 it seems, on the contrary, to impede the dissociative adsorption. This result contrasts with previous examples for which strain is found to modify equally the energetics of chemisorption and dissociation. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.066103 PACS numbers: 68.43.−h, 34.35.+a, 82.20.Kh, 82.65.+r The adsorption of nitrogen on iron surfaces is the standard textbook example when linking basic surface science and industrial heterogeneous catalysis [1]. N 2 adsorption and dissociation is the rate limiting step in ammonia synthesis and iron-based compounds are the preferred solid catalyzers for such a process. It is not a surprise then that extensive research has been devoted to understand and ameliorate the chemistry between N 2 and Fe surfaces [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Chemical properties can be locally altered by several elements, including defects, steps, and/or other adsorbed species. Local strain at the surface has been also shown to change surface reactivity in a significant way [11,12]. However, tuning the adsorption properties in the extended surface is much more involved. A clever way to do so is the pseudomorphic growth of ultrathin metallic films on top of substrates with different lattice constants. The electronic properties of the stretched (compressed) surface can be substantially modified giving rise to profound changes in the adsorption energetics between strained and unstrained surfaces [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Hitherto, all the studied systems show that the overall adsorption properties are equally altered, i.e., that the atomic, molecular, and dissociative adsorption are either all improved or all reduced.In the particular case of N 2 , it has been experimentally shown that the growth of Fe layers on W(110) strongly enhances the adsorption and dissociation of N 2 as compared with the otherwise fairly unreactive Fe(110) surface [6]. These observations agree with the above mentioned existing understanding of how surface strain affects the overall adsorption properties. However, we show here by means of molecular dynamics simulations that while surface strain favors molecular adsorption due to a uniform reduction of the energy barriers accessing the wells, its effect on the energetics of the dissociation process is surprisingly the opposite and, therefore, the observed atomic N cannot be directly attributed to surface strain in this case. We actually find that the minimum energy barrier to dissociation found in Fe(110) increases by about 500 meV in Fe=Wð110Þ. Interestingly, this energy upshift is not uniformly ...