2011
DOI: 10.1108/00251741111094491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment, management attitude, and organizational learning in alliances

Abstract: Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework for organizational learning in an alliance-based context. An interaction effect of environmental turbulence on the relationship between top management attitude towards learning and organizational learning is proposed. Design/methodology/approach -The paper begins with the notion that alliances provide an opportunity for organizations to learn from one another. The paper describes three basic tenets of organizational learning. It then proposes how top… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation might be related to the limited management attitudes that characterize small firms (Benmore and Palmer, 1996), which often adopt a conservative approach, especially when they have to make changes such as the conquest of new markets (Donckels and Fröhlich, 1991). Furthermore, according to Srivastava and Frankwick (2011), management attitudes may have been moderated by the recent market changes and financial crisis. In any case, not all the features that relate to management attitudes influence export behavior (Suárez-Ortega and Álamo-Vera, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation might be related to the limited management attitudes that characterize small firms (Benmore and Palmer, 1996), which often adopt a conservative approach, especially when they have to make changes such as the conquest of new markets (Donckels and Fröhlich, 1991). Furthermore, according to Srivastava and Frankwick (2011), management attitudes may have been moderated by the recent market changes and financial crisis. In any case, not all the features that relate to management attitudes influence export behavior (Suárez-Ortega and Álamo-Vera, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task environment is the external condition that affects the organization's internal behavior and functioning of firm (Dess & Beard, 1984;Srivastava & Frankwick, 2011). One major aspect of task environment is technological turbulence which defined as "the rate of technological change in the industry" (Kohli & Jaworski, 1990), and is believed to influence firm's governance decisions and determine the value of various governance structures (Dess & Beard, 1984;Claussen, Kretschmer, & Stieglitz, 2015;Qian, Yang, & Li, 2016), such as the formation of alliances (Hagedoorn, 1993), the effects of contract governance (Lee and Cavusgil, 2006) and "guanxi" (Gu, Hung, and Tse, 2008).…”
Section: Task Environment and Institutional Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elisenhardt and Martin (2000) also addressed the importance of the environment in analyzing the effect of capabilities in organizational learning because different degrees of turbulent environments imply different valuations of dynamic capabilities. Srivastava and Frankwick (2011) found that the degree of environmental turbulence affects the way organizational learning takes place including the focus in attitude, intent, and receptivity toward OL by top management.…”
Section: Cognition Affects Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%