2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment-oriented selection criteria to overcome controversies in breeding for drought resistance in wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly pronounced in field analysis, where the genotype × environment interaction reaches its peak complexity. As a result, currently, the assessment of drought susceptibility in the field often contradicts in vitro screenings, if based only on one or few biochemical markers [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly pronounced in field analysis, where the genotype × environment interaction reaches its peak complexity. As a result, currently, the assessment of drought susceptibility in the field often contradicts in vitro screenings, if based only on one or few biochemical markers [18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced water stress has been widely used to screen wheat genotypes' sensitivity to drought at seedling stage, as these tests are quick, easy, and inexpensive to conduct [12,13]. Therefore, MDA content at seedling stage under PEG-induced stress conditions has been used as a criterion to phenotype wheat genotypes for drought tolerance [14][15][16][17], as high-molecular-weight PEG (PEG-6000) mimics drought conditions without altering plant hydraulic properties [18] and has been suggested as the most efficient for in vitro screenings [19][20][21]. Despite being widely used, the concentrations of PEG-6000 used for screening bread and durum wheat seedlings for DS resistance, assessed via morphological, physiological and biochemical assays (including MDA quantification), vary greatly, ranging from 100 g/L to even more than 300 g/L [12,15,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confluence of issues tothreatens global food security and highlights the urgency of resolving the complicated mechanisms underlying drought tolerance in wheat [4]. Along with the increasing drought stress induced by global warming, the identification of accessions that exhibit tolerance to drought stress has been regarded as one of the most critical tasks for research into genetic improvement in wheat [5][6][7]. Therefore, dissecting wheat responses to drought stress is indispensable for the current and future improvement of wheat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim como em outras culturas, o trigo também é fortemente influenciado por variações ambientais. Por exemplo, mudanças na quantidade de precipitação pluvial reduz a oferta de água às plantas, o que pode impactar em diversas variáveis, tais como em um menor índice de área foliar (IAF), número de grãos por espiga e peso de 1000 grãos, reduzindo consequentemente o rendimento final da cultura (POGGI et al, 2023). Em ambientes com menor quantidade de água disponível, espera-se que a interação genótipo × ambiente seja mais complexa, reduzindo-se a capacidade estatística de identificar genótipos superiores (CHENU et al, 2011).…”
Section: Trigo Durum (T Turgidum)unclassified