2020
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci14473-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment, Photosynthesis, and Adventitious Rooting of Manchurian Lilac Cuttings Propagated in Overhead Mist, Submist, and Combination Systems

Abstract: We propagated manchurian lilac (Syringa pubescens subsp. patula ‘Miss Kim’) vegetatively from stem cuttings using overhead mist, submist, and combination propagation systems. Cuttings were collected when terminal buds were already set, after the period of tender growth that is optimal for lilac propagation. Net photosynthesis (Pn) was recorded to assess whether differences in rooting could be attributed to differences in photosy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the need for future research on the underlying mechanisms and key factors in the plant-microorganism-abiotic environment continuum. More details about the modes of action of the distinct environmental inputs ( Figure 1 ) on cutting function consider also findings and concepts of Kadner and Druege (2004) , Husen and Pal (2007) , Rapaka et al (2008) , Bredmose and Nielsen (2009) , Agulló-Antón et al (2011) , Osterc and Stampar (2011) , Franken (2012) , da Costa et al (2013) , Bauerfeind et al (2015) , Rasmussen et al (2015) , Otiende et al (2017) , Zhang et al (2017) , Ferrari et al (2018) , Peterson et al (2018) , Taylor and Hoover (2018) , Cho et al (2019) , Heide (2019) , Sanchez et al (2020) and are summarized in Supplementary Table S1 .…”
Section: Systemic Model Of Propagation By Cuttingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the need for future research on the underlying mechanisms and key factors in the plant-microorganism-abiotic environment continuum. More details about the modes of action of the distinct environmental inputs ( Figure 1 ) on cutting function consider also findings and concepts of Kadner and Druege (2004) , Husen and Pal (2007) , Rapaka et al (2008) , Bredmose and Nielsen (2009) , Agulló-Antón et al (2011) , Osterc and Stampar (2011) , Franken (2012) , da Costa et al (2013) , Bauerfeind et al (2015) , Rasmussen et al (2015) , Otiende et al (2017) , Zhang et al (2017) , Ferrari et al (2018) , Peterson et al (2018) , Taylor and Hoover (2018) , Cho et al (2019) , Heide (2019) , Sanchez et al (2020) and are summarized in Supplementary Table S1 .…”
Section: Systemic Model Of Propagation By Cuttingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tem cuttings are traditionally propagated using overhead mist systems. Recent work has explored the use of a different approach: submist propagation (Peterson et al, 2018a(Peterson et al, , 2018bSanchez et al, 2020). Submist propagation systems apply water to the basal portions of cutting stems, rather than overhead.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuttings are suspended in an enclosure that contains a manifold of mist nozzles. Plants propagated in this system may have superior rooting compared with those propagated in overhead mist (Peterson et al, 2018a(Peterson et al, , 2018bSanchez et al, 2020). After propagation, cuttings are transplanted into soilless media, and their growth is similar to that of plants propagated in overhead mist (Peterson et al, 2018a(Peterson et al, , 2018b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations