2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.582933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and Biological Factors Influencing Dispersal of Neonate Leatherback Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) From an Endangered Costa Rican Nesting Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of our ex situ experimental treatments had any detectable impact on hatchling performance or morphology. Likewise, incubation treatment had no detectable effect on hatchling dispersal, measured as overground speed and bearing, with all hatchlings moving in an east–south–easterly bearing (mean = 112.3°) with an overall mean overground speed of 0.41 m/s, which is congruent with observations from other studies of hatchling dispersal from this population (Barbour et al, 2020; Hoover et al, 2020). Similarly, there was no detectable impact on the morphology of olive ridley hatchlings that were incubated in hypoxia for 3 days, except that they had a greater mass than those incubated in normoxia (Williamson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…None of our ex situ experimental treatments had any detectable impact on hatchling performance or morphology. Likewise, incubation treatment had no detectable effect on hatchling dispersal, measured as overground speed and bearing, with all hatchlings moving in an east–south–easterly bearing (mean = 112.3°) with an overall mean overground speed of 0.41 m/s, which is congruent with observations from other studies of hatchling dispersal from this population (Barbour et al, 2020; Hoover et al, 2020). Similarly, there was no detectable impact on the morphology of olive ridley hatchlings that were incubated in hypoxia for 3 days, except that they had a greater mass than those incubated in normoxia (Williamson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is possible that turtles originating from Costa Rica and elsewhere in the main Caribbean basin may become trapped in the circulation of smaller gyres (Figure 1 ; Luke et al, 2004 ). Post‐hatchling turtles from Tortuguero, for example, could develop within the Caribbean and be transported toward Jamaica, Hispaniola, and Cuba via these small gyres (Blumenthal et al, 2009 ), and then subsequently recruit to the Great Inagua foraging assemblage as juveniles (Figure 1 ; Barbour et al, 2020 ; Jensen et al, 2016 ). Juvenile green turtles are known to forage within the Caribbean (Bass et al, 1998 ; Campbell & Lagueux, 2005 ), and it is possible that some develop within the Caribbean, feeding within sargassum mats trapped within these gyres (Troeng et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the smallest transmitters weighing just under 0.4 g (Thums et al, 2013;Whoriskey and Hindell, 2016), acoustic telemetry offers a novel approach to gain in situ insights into the factors affecting nearshore marine turtle hatchling dispersal. It has been used to monitor movements of hatchlings to study the influence of oceanic conditions (Scott et al, 2014;Thums et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2018;Barbour et al, 2020;Hoover et al, 2020), artificial light (Thums et al, 2013(Thums et al, , 2016Wilson et al, 2018Wilson et al, , 2019, swimming speed and fitness (Scott et al, 2014;Barbour et al, 2020), and predation (Wilson et al, 2019) on dispersal patterns. These studies have found that while hatchlings exhibit active, directed swimming, oceanic conditions and anthropogenic factors (e.g., artificial lights, increased predation due to jetties) greatly affect their trajectories (Thums et al, 2013(Thums et al, , 2016Scott et al, 2014;Wilson et al, 2018;Barbour et al, 2020;Hoover et al, 2020), which has important implications for dispersal patterns, especially when considering the short-and long-term variability of oceanic conditions (Scott et al, 2014;Barbour et al, 2020).…”
Section: Hatchling Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used to monitor movements of hatchlings to study the influence of oceanic conditions (Scott et al, 2014;Thums et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2018;Barbour et al, 2020;Hoover et al, 2020), artificial light (Thums et al, 2013(Thums et al, , 2016Wilson et al, 2018Wilson et al, , 2019, swimming speed and fitness (Scott et al, 2014;Barbour et al, 2020), and predation (Wilson et al, 2019) on dispersal patterns. These studies have found that while hatchlings exhibit active, directed swimming, oceanic conditions and anthropogenic factors (e.g., artificial lights, increased predation due to jetties) greatly affect their trajectories (Thums et al, 2013(Thums et al, , 2016Scott et al, 2014;Wilson et al, 2018;Barbour et al, 2020;Hoover et al, 2020), which has important implications for dispersal patterns, especially when considering the short-and long-term variability of oceanic conditions (Scott et al, 2014;Barbour et al, 2020). Data from acoustic studies can contribute to more accurate models and simulations of hatchling dispersal to better predict how changes in global climate, ocean currents, and coastal development will affect the survival and oceanic distributions of marine turtles (Scott et al, 2014;Thums et al, 2016;Wildermann et al, 2017;Putman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Hatchling Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%