2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and economic sustainability of the nitrogen recovery paradigm: Evidence from a structured literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ten times more power than compressing the additional volumes of nitrogen present in the air (respectively 3.5 kWh.kg O2 -1 ; ecoinvent, 2022; and 0.32 kWh.kg O2 -1 ; see section SI.4.6). The option to recover nitrogen from AD's digestate was not assessed for three reasons: digestate is a constrained resource (thus not available on demand), unravelling the best N source to supply bioprocesses remains an open research question (Matassa et al, 2023;Spiller et al, 2022), and nally, only advanced and multiple risk-clearing barriers N recovery pathways would unlock the safe reuse of waste-based N for food and feed services (see risk mitigation criteria in section 2.1.3.). These recovery technologies are currently immature (Khoshnevisan et al, 2022), preventing robust modeling.…”
Section: Microbial Proteins Production From Residual-based Gases: For...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ten times more power than compressing the additional volumes of nitrogen present in the air (respectively 3.5 kWh.kg O2 -1 ; ecoinvent, 2022; and 0.32 kWh.kg O2 -1 ; see section SI.4.6). The option to recover nitrogen from AD's digestate was not assessed for three reasons: digestate is a constrained resource (thus not available on demand), unravelling the best N source to supply bioprocesses remains an open research question (Matassa et al, 2023;Spiller et al, 2022), and nally, only advanced and multiple risk-clearing barriers N recovery pathways would unlock the safe reuse of waste-based N for food and feed services (see risk mitigation criteria in section 2.1.3.). These recovery technologies are currently immature (Khoshnevisan et al, 2022), preventing robust modeling.…”
Section: Microbial Proteins Production From Residual-based Gases: For...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond that, in SFAs a further distinction into diffuse emissions and point source emissions in a replicable manner will be of added value. The reason for this is that recovery technologies are likely applied to point source emissions, rather than diffuse emissions of N and P (Spiller et al, 2022), and therefore this distinction can enable the assessment of indicators relevant to circular nutrient management. To the knowledge of the authors, there is currently no study that classifies flows of N and P into more detail than by-products.…”
Section: Capcapitamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic literature survey focusing on the sustainability of nitrogen recovery from waste showed that domestic wastewater is the most explored stream for this purpose [ 35 ]. This is due to the volume of the stream and the stringent discharge and emission limits imposed upon wastewater treatment plants.…”
Section: Nitrogen Recovery Waste Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%