2000
DOI: 10.1300/j064v15n04_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and Economic Tradeoffs of Alternative Cropping Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum coverage is greater than 0%, meaning that for any given sub-basin there are corresponding sub-basins with the same rough set pattern. Practically, this is crucial information in terms of BMP placement, because it means that there are options in terms of location or sub-basin which have same pattern of economic costs [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Rough Sets Decision For Economic Costs Of Bmpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum coverage is greater than 0%, meaning that for any given sub-basin there are corresponding sub-basins with the same rough set pattern. Practically, this is crucial information in terms of BMP placement, because it means that there are options in terms of location or sub-basin which have same pattern of economic costs [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Rough Sets Decision For Economic Costs Of Bmpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
The economic cost of agricultural conservation practices has been widely studied. Studies have been conducted, for example, to estimate economic costs of conservation tillage [6,7], crop rotation (Kelly et al 1996;Koo 2000; Choi and Sohngen 2003), land retirement [8,9], buffer strips and riparian areas [10,11].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%