2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9gc04036f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental assessment of the near-net-shape electrochemical metallisation process and the Kroll-electron beam melting process for titanium manufacture

Abstract: A comparative environmental assessment of a novel additive manufacturing technique against the established conventional route for titanium manufacture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study on the use of shaped oxide via the 'Near-net-shape Electrochemical Metallisation (NEM) process' attempted to quantify the environmental impacts of components produced using this method, compared to electron beam melting of Kroll derived, gas atomised powders. It found that the NEM process dramatically reduced the overall environmental impact by about 68% in comparison [22]. Overall, the continued research and improvement of Ti extraction via the FFC-Cambridge process, along with supporting evidence of the potential advantages, demonstrates the potential for further exploitation of this technology in the future.…”
Section: Ti Extraction Via the Ffc-cambridge Processmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study on the use of shaped oxide via the 'Near-net-shape Electrochemical Metallisation (NEM) process' attempted to quantify the environmental impacts of components produced using this method, compared to electron beam melting of Kroll derived, gas atomised powders. It found that the NEM process dramatically reduced the overall environmental impact by about 68% in comparison [22]. Overall, the continued research and improvement of Ti extraction via the FFC-Cambridge process, along with supporting evidence of the potential advantages, demonstrates the potential for further exploitation of this technology in the future.…”
Section: Ti Extraction Via the Ffc-cambridge Processmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Until recently, most research has used pigment grade rutile (TiO 2 ) to produce Ti via the FFC-Cambridge process; but significant cost reduction can be achieved using lower purity precursor materials instead [22,23]. One example is synthetic rutile (SR), which contains around 90-95% TiO 2 , and is usually further processed into TiCl 4 for use in conventional Kroll extraction [24].…”
Section: Ti Extraction Via the Ffc-cambridge Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent developments in DIW of titanium dioxide have focused on the production of scaffolds or biomedical implants and the manufacture of dense ceramic components [19,20]. It is important to highlight that such scaffolds are required to possess a certain porosity to allow for body tissue to grow through it, resulting in improved biocompatibility [17,21]. In addition, mechanical properties of such scaffolds are required to be close to that of a human bone, to reduce stress shielding and minimise bone resorption [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potential application of DIW of titanium dioxide is the recently proposed manufacturing of titanium components via the Near-net-shape Electrochemical Metallisation (NEM) Process [21]. This is an indirect titanium AM process where the ceramic green body (i.e., metal oxide or its mixtures) is 3D printed first and then in situ metallised to its metal or alloy counterpart via the solid-state deoxidation process in a molten salt (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Its manufacturing costs have been significantly decreased, eventually surpassing the compatible method, the Hunter process. 2) However, the Kroll process is still regarded as an expensive and environmentally unfriendly method, 3) and the industrial applications of Ti are still restricted to a few high-end products. Hence Kroll, the inventor of Kroll process, expected that it will be replaced by another method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%