2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2005.00140.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental bias? Effects of housing conditions, laboratory environment and experimenter on behavioral tests

Abstract: Behavioral testing does not always yield similar results when replicated in different laboratories, and it usually remains unclear whether the variability in results is caused by different laboratory environments or different experimenters conducting the tests. In our study, we applied a systematic variation of housing conditions, laboratories and experimenters in order to test the influence of these variables on the outcome of behavioral tests. We wanted to know whether known effects of different housing cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
86
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, no deficits were observed by Salinger et al in a floorplate nose-poke task (Salinger et al 2003). These inconsistencies between laboratories may result from differences in the age of the mice, training and testing protocols, rearing conditions, and genetic background, all of which can easily influence the outcome of behavioral experiments (Wahlsten et al 2003;Lewejohann et al 2006). This potential susceptibility to precise experimental conditions may reflect the fact that changes induced by reelin haploinsufficiency are either very specific or very subtle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, no deficits were observed by Salinger et al in a floorplate nose-poke task (Salinger et al 2003). These inconsistencies between laboratories may result from differences in the age of the mice, training and testing protocols, rearing conditions, and genetic background, all of which can easily influence the outcome of behavioral experiments (Wahlsten et al 2003;Lewejohann et al 2006). This potential susceptibility to precise experimental conditions may reflect the fact that changes induced by reelin haploinsufficiency are either very specific or very subtle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ndings of this paper have important implications for animal husbandry and housing standardization. Behavioral testing across laboratories does not always yield similar results despite rigorous attempts at standardization [46,47]. One unknown variable that may contribute to be disparate behaviors across laboratories may be bedding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a detailed description of behavioral tests see Ref. 29. Data analysis was conducted using the statistical software "R" (The R Project for Statistical Computing, available on the web) using non-parametric statistics.…”
Section: Figure 3 Ndst3mentioning
confidence: 99%