Environmental conditions at arrival to the wintering grounds and during spring migration affect population dynamics of barn swallowsHirundo rusticabreeding in Northern Italy

Abstract

Several populations of long‐distance migratory birds are currently suffering steep demographic declines. The identification of the causes of such declines is difficult because population changes may be driven by events occurring in distant geographical areas during different phases of the annual life‐cycle of migrants. Furthermore, wintering areas and migration routes of populations of small‐sized species are still largely unknown, with few exceptions. In this paper we identified the critical phases of the annual life‐cycle that most influence the population dynamics of a small passerine, the Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica. We used information on temporal dynamics of a population breeding in Northern Italy, whose wintering range and timing of migration have been recently described by miniaturised tracking dataloggers. Our results indicated that primary productivity in the wintering grounds in the month when most individuals arrive from autumn migration and primary productivity in an area that is probably a stopover site during spring migration, influenced population dynamics more than habitat conditions at the breeding grounds. By using annual variation in primary productivity at the wintering grounds and stopover sites as predictors, we replicated the observed interannual population changes with great accuracy. However, the steep decline recently suffered by the population could be replicated only by including a constant annual decline in the model, suggesting that changes in primary productivity only predicted the interannual variation around the long‐term trend. Our study therefore suggests the existence of critical periods during wintering and migration that may have large impact on population fluctuations of migrant birds.

Are Landscape Configuration Metrics Worth Including When Predicting Specialist and Generalist Bird Species Density? A Case of the Generalised Additive Model Approach

“…The results also extend a pattern in which a higher spectral index, here NDVI, corresponds to higher species density [51]. It shows that an inter-seasonal variation of green vegetation also plays an important role.…”

Earlier nesting by generalist predatory bird is associated with human responses to climate change

“…As human systems begin to shift in response to climate change, understanding the relationships between alterations in either or both climate and human activity will become increasingly important. This study also demonstrates the importance of considering full annual cycles (Balbont ın et al 2009;Williams et al 2015& Sicurella et al 2016 when discussing climate change, as winter, not spring, temperatures predict the timing of the SoGS, especially in agricultural systems (Smith 2016). Fig.…”

“… & Sicurella et al . ) when discussing climate change, as winter, not spring, temperatures predict the timing of the SoGS, especially in agricultural systems (Smith ).…”

Different trends of neighboring populations of Lesser Kestrel: Effects of climate and other environmental conditions

“…We modeled the effect of climate and environmental conditions (see Figure for the complete list) on the size of Lesser Kestrel populations in the two study areas using the statistical approach proposed by Sicurella, Musitelli, Rubolini, Saino, and Ambrosini (). As a first step, we calculated the year‐to‐year variation of both the series of predictors and the dependent variables (i.e., the number of breeding pairs in each year and study area), with the aim to remove the potential confounding effects due to the presence of temporal trends or temporal autocorrelations in both the dependent variable and the predictors.…”

“…In contrast, we referred to the actual yearly counts and predictors as “original” variables. Similar to Sicurella et al (), we opted to use the differences in population size between two consecutive years (Δ‐variables), instead of the ratio between the population sizes in two consecutive years (λ), because the Δ variables were normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk test for the lowland: W = 0.98, p = 0.985; and for the highland: W = 0.92, p = 0.348), while λ values were not (for the lowland: W = 0.84, p = 0.037; and for the highland: W = 0.95, p = 0.682). In addition, the use of Δ‐variables allowed us to take into account the uncertainty of the yearly estimates of population size obtained from the rtrim models (see below).…”